I appreciate the logical way you expressed this sentiment that I have been struggling with for months now. As a state employee of one of the most jabbed states in the US, I am disgusted in state leadership and even fellow employees who are acting as propagandists to push these deadly jabs. We were all asked to add a blurb to our email signatures promoting the toxic juice for everyone 5 and up and it turns my stomach to see it at the bottom of most emails I receive every day. I have long thought that everyone complying with this ask is complicit in crimes against humanity but you said it better: they are morally guilty of participation in murder.
Love it! I wonder how long it would take someone to ask/tell me to remove it if I added that to my signature instead. I work for a "health" department so everyone is very proud of their contributions to they psyop that is the last two years.
I have the same stomach turning every time my superintendent promotes the vaccine for children. This article made it very clear why I feel they are committing a crime.
When the risks are explained to them by awakened souls and they are ignored.
When we are told that Vaers and the Yellow card systems are just full of false reports by antivaxxers, without even a cursory check.
When they refuse to even consider another viewpoint than the one CNN / BBC / WAPO / Guardian told them was correct.
When they have not applied even a modicum of critical thought throughout when witnessing the daily about turns and illogical rulings from government. When they saw the "elites" repeatedly ignoring all of the rules they placed on the rest of us.
Something which has been glaringly obvious to anyone with a single functioning brain cell.
When they hated the jab because of Trump, but now love the jab because of Fauci and force others to take the poison.
THEREFORE it is now wilful ignorance for a huge segment of the population and only the effects on those close to them might awaken them from their stupor.
Actually- no. Reread the article. “Rate” is odds and odds has nothing to do with moral culpability. Whether you imagine .0005% or more, you are accepting the death lottery. So you share in moral culpability. Added to that was the discussion on the child’s trust that the adults did the moral calculus on his or her behalf. Every authority in a child’s life that makes a decision for said child or children is engaging in a moral calculus and so inherits the consequence. If you are responsible for someone’s life and fail to do due diligence, you are guilty of tge most cavalier murder: “Ah- who can be bothered figuring this out. Hope you aren’t unlucky, kid! What can I tell ya! Life stinks. We all die anyway. Good luck to ya!” Sociopath much?
From the article: "Mistake or Ignorance of Fact - If one is ignorant of the fact that a lottery results in the deaths of others, then it cannot be murder. In such a case, there is no knowledge constituting any type of guilty mind."
I responded to the “death rate” in your initial reply. Rate is about “how many” not “if”. From the article: “This does not, however, include people with knowledge that some die from C19 vaccines in “rare” adverse outcomes. Belief that deaths resulting from the C19 vaccine are “rare” is not ignorance of fact. If you know it is “rare”, then you know that death does in-fact occur. The meaning of “rare” in context of percentages does not matter. The odds of the lottery may be high or low, but it is a death lottery nonetheless; and participation in the lottery is willful participation in murder.” End quote
On October 22, 2020, the FDA advisory committee panel already had "death" on their list of possible injection outcomes... before they even "authorized" the injections for "emergency use".
The relevant slide flashes by around the 2:33:40 mark...
I am not sure what exactly "the part" is. Are you saying that they did NOT know that death was a potential outcome? When ALL the previously attempted mRNA animal trials FAILED? Because the animals DIED....
Thank you. Thank you for speaking for the lost, and the destroyed; it has been so painful watching the world turn away as if they didn’t exist. Your essay brought tears.
Thanks for such a rational exposition of a usually provocative (emotionally) subject. Its maddening, really mind blowing for me. I’m GenX- classic, posterchild GenX. We got ALL the tools to deal with this moment. All the literature, like Jackson, to the nonfiction we studied, from grammar to high school, nevermind after that, was about understanding how the horrors of the 20th C could happen. So I watched all this take place wondering if really I am in a matrix because certainly everyone sees/knows/understands right? Right?!!!! Or is it Invasion of the Body Snatchers that’s occurred? Like WTF man! Wake up! But I am screaming into the abyss, apparently.
I'm also GenX but on the Millennial cusp (Oregon Trail generation is the best description I've found thus far for my micro generation haha) and I also have no idea what happened to my people, or the youth of today. We were hippies and punk rockers who didn't trust the man, the establishment, or anyone else for that matter. Then I moved to Vermont 20+ years ago and I thought I had found my people: free thinkers who love nature and want to create a life of at least some semblance of self-sufficiency. But the virtue signaling and covid fear porn have gripped the old hippies in a way I could never have predicted! And who would have thought that the drug of choice for both the hippies and punk rockers would end up being an experimental pharmaceutical? Man, I really just want off this planet some days.
Agreed. Unrecognizable. For quite a while I wondered where they came from. Maybe cloned in labs? They bear no resemblance to “organic youth” I’ve known, or read, in my time till now.
What a joy to learn about you and your work. Yes to all of the above. Glad to have found you. A recommendation by bad catittude. Substack is one of the best things that's happened to media in the last 2 years.
“They do say,” Mr. Adams said to Old Man Warner, who stood next to him, “that over in the north village they’re talking of giving up the lottery.”
Old Man Warner snorted. “Pack of crazy fools,” he said. “Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them. Next thing you know, they’ll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work any more, live that way for a while. Used to be a saying about ‘Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.’ First thing you know, we’d all be eating stewed chickweed and acorns. There’s always been a lottery,” he added petulantly. “Bad enough to see young Joe Summers up there joking with everybody.”
“Some places have already quit lotteries,” Mrs. Adams said.
“Nothing but trouble in that,” Old Man Warner said stoutly. “Pack of young fools.”
_________________________________
I can see this exact conversation happening between teachers in Chicago right now: "I hear they don't make toddlers wear mask in Shelbyville and North Haverbook"
Profound. Thank you, even though it reminded me of The Lottery one of a few stories I wouldn't have minded to NOT have read, especially at a young age.
Superb and faultless. There's probably no need to even mention the word "genocide". Yet the flagrant level of immorality imbedded in the "mass formation psychosis" (Robert Malone's term) should indicate that the sheer scale of destruction rides roughshod over any discussion of morality. This was evil incarnate.
This is an absolutely brilliant way to describe vaccine mandates. Too long a read probably for those who are still "ignorant" after all this time and availability of information. What about the paid propagandists who actively suppress the information? In their case, we could allege pre-meditated murder, couldn't we? What's the sentence for that in America?
"There should be no coercion of any kind for people to vaccinate, else those coercing others are morally guilty of participation in murder, wherever and whenever that death occurs."
This is the root of the issue. It is established beyond all doubt that C-19 mass 'vaccination' is a death lottery and the people responsible for C-19 mass 'vaccination' campaigns know that they are a death lottery. Coercing, even mandating people to buy a ticket, or multiple tickets, thus increasing one's chance of getting 'lucky', is an act of mass murder sponsored by pharmaceutical companies in an unholy alliance with our governments. Prosecuting them for what will undoubtedly amount to a global genocide against which all other national genocides combined pale in comparison (including the deaths accumulated from the prerequisite killer lockdowns) is going to be very difficult, because I doubt even the International Criminal Court will have the courage, moral fortitude, or willingness to take on board this monstrous crime.
There is no escaping the death lotteries. The complement of a death lottery is a death lottery as well. The point is transparency about your odds in the different lotteries.
Back in the summer of 2020, I came across a 232 page manual that the WHO had published, their “Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance” manual. I read the whole thing and it purported to be a guide on how world governments should surveil and respond to the eventual rollout. And on page 91 if I recall, there was a long list of many of the deadly complications and woundings we have been seeing since the rollout. I archived the manual, thankfully. A few months later, it had been wiped from the internet and all I could find was a truncated 18 page WHO Covid-19 Surveillance “manual” instead. So shameful that they knew all of these terrible effects and adverse reactions could happen so many months BEFORE the vaccines were rolled out in Dec of 2020. So shameful, it’s truly repulsive.
Every person on earth knows that a tiny percentage of people will die from the pre-covid vaccines given to adults and children alike. Are we all morally guilty of participating in a death lottery pre-covid? Are we all guilty of participating in a death lottery by allowing someone else to drive a car home from our house?
Are they mandated to drive away? Are you coercing them to drive away? It is the mandate that is the problem. And yes, look into vaccines, pre-mRNA type. It's not pretty.
I have looked into it, and completely agree. And I agree about the mandate being the problem. But the author vilifies anyone who doesn't stop a vaccine that might kill a very small amount of people - which is all of the previous vaccines. I think that's a step too far.
The difference being that with previous vaccines, one has been allowed personally (or for one's children) to decline, without punishment, exclusion from society, etc. *And*, much more information has been given up front about risks, benefits, more truly informed consent.
We are not talking about a small amount of people. We are talking about all cause death being up 400% by some insurance red flags. We are talking genocide, a Vietnam War level death for the under 40 group. Start looking and you will see. Morticians cant keep up and these are non covid deaths that happen soon after vaccination. All over the world. Look at your own towns obituary page for deaths- in our paper it is easy to see a dramatic rise even there compared to previous.
I totally agree. I was just trying to make the point that Covid "vaccines" have been introduced, promoted & required in a completely different (ethically wrong) manner than all other vaccines. I am a (retired - because I declined Covid vax) nurse who was formerly injured by a flu vaccine (to the point of brain surgery) & have had issues with Hep B vaccines as well. I worked until end of September 2021. I have seen far more vaccine injury (in friends & patients) than I have Covid. This is, of course, "speculation" on my part, since documentation of such effects is rarely questioned with respect to Covid vaccines. (I live in Canada).
Super important to see VAXXED if you can. Also worthwhile to compare the vaccine schedule for kids today compared to the 1970s or even 1980's...a ridiculous number of shots are 'recommended', more like demanded when you consider schooling, sports and travel. No one considers their cumulitive effects, though I did see one physician ask at a cdc meeting last year. No was the answer to whether they consider cumulutive effects of esp. adjuvants and excipients. On the flip side, schools are now trying to avoid future liability by screening all vaccinated students who want to do sports for heart issues prior. The vaccinated are not allowed to play till that. (story at The Highwire last week). So ridiculous and tragic.
Dr. Paul Thomas in Portland worked on the cumulative effects of the CDC infant programme. A recent paper was forcibly retracted, which has also happened with other "contra-narrative" reports.
But you must realize that "Previous vaccines" do not all stop transmission...like whooping cough etc....so the kids take whooping cough home to their newborn sibling....who could die. That you cannot get Tetanus anymore without Whooping cough, etc....and that there is no earthly reason any newborn on the day of birth should get a HepB vaccine?
Please don't stop thinking at a certain point. Because you are a nurse and have your eyes open, you are doubly valuable , especially if you are able to start questioning everything you think you ever knew. Go beyond please, because we need people like you. When you do, you will start to realize that much of what we were taught to believe is not supported by science. It is just that the science is hidden/censored/not published and the people who try to get the word out are banned from their professions.
Oh, absolutely. I was shocked when a grandson (in US) was given Hep B vaccine on the day he was born. It's not on the list in Ontario, Canada till Grade 7-8 (should not be then either). A copy of "Dissolving Illusions" by Suzanne Humphries awaits my reading (along with many many studies on flu shots, Covid shots, etc). I retired rather than fired for lack of Covid shot, but in most ways (other than financial).I don't regret it. The medical system and I hadn't been seeing eye to eye for years.
The amount doesn't matter. If one person is killed by forcefully administering 8 billion people with 4 shots each, that one person has been killed, plain and simple, no two ways about it.
And killing a person that didn't imminently threaten anyone's life is morally wrong at the highest degree.
But without spiritual beliefs, people turn themselves into animals and are being dealt with as such by the higher-ups.
True. I think it's deference to what or whom seems all-knowing to them, combined with that ol stockholm thang, combined with the possibility that what has been injected is acting on them, continuously or at specific times or conditions....graphene and microwaves are such an intoxicationg combination, from what little I can stand to research.
Again, it's not about "stopping a vaccine"... it's about stopping the mandates.
Also, these mRNA injections are NOT "vaccines". Using that term is deliberate and intentional brainwashing, because the vast majority of people automatically associate "safe and effective and life saving" with that term.
No it is really not a step too far. No one should be mandated to take any vaccine. Period. End of story. And parents who vaccinate their children, if they have any inkling that following the vax schedule CDC recommends results in autism, they are guilty too. Many parents do not. But some do. And schools that require the childhood vaxines are equally guilty and responsible. Full stop.
Voluntary participation in a death lottery is not the issue. Being mandated to participate IS. Anyone supporting and enforcing or even encouraging such participation is guilty!
Where there is risk there MUST be choice.
Choice under duress and threat of employment termination is NOT a genuine choice.
But again, life is by definition a death lottery. It's very important not to conflate a murder lottery (including something like Russian roulette), with a death lottery (including every single thing there is that carries with it even the smallest risk of death). And many of the things that constitute a death lottery, thus defined, are not and morally speaking need not be voluntary. If (1) it was known that some action V really was safe and effective, and (2) that there was no excuse for not knowing that V really was safe and effective, and (3) it was known that omitting V was gravely dangerous, then it would make more sense to say that it's the people who forego V who are participating in a "death lottery," than the people who choose V. Indeed, this has been the precise rhetoric of the covidian cultists: people how forego the miracles vaxxes are playing Russian roulette (a deranged Australian legislator made exactly this claim with reference to the supposed need for draconian lockdowns). In short, if it were actually true that "anti-vaxxers" are just deranged lunatics who are recklessly and wantonly putting their own and others' lives in grave danger, then there wouldn't be much of a case against employing coercive measures to pressure them to do the right thing, that all reasonable people can see is the right thing. The problem for the covidian cultists is just that those are not the actual facts of the case, and it's hard to see how any reasonable person has any excuse for failing to see that those are not the actual facts of the case. (However, as we know, there has been a shockingly relentless, unscrupulous, and effective propaganda campaign, so we see what we see...) Thus the mandates are wrong, but that is a function of the particular facts of the case, not of a general principle that says that all risk must be assumed voluntarily.
I think you're confused. Are you agreeing with me? My point was indeed that what matters is that it is "this risk," i.e., the particular facts of the case in question, that are morally decisive, as opposed to the erroneous general principles advanced by CdC. Yet you seem to think that you are disagreeing with me... What is it you think I don't understand???
Now that I have seen VAXXED, with this debacle, I can say yes we are complicit. And yes, we are in a death lottery whether we choose a car, a horse, a train or a plane or to walk or bike or skateboard. Or not to go out ever and have depression and more illness just from staying indoors. We choose the benefit, as it has been explained to us, (believing and gullible souls) over the danger, or vice versa and stay home, or likely walk. This is the business of the actuary, and so this discussion is inextricably tied to money. To note here is that insurance against death operates on a very steady death rate. So, we are now in un-insurable land, which does not affect my life at this time, but will likely affect all that we do and transact.
As I assess the role of vaccines throughout my life I have had some recent revelations that cause me to suspect more of the illnesses I saw in my family and in myself (born mid 1960's) were related to the vaccinations I did receive. The poisoning agenda of humans and the land these last 40 years is becoming as plain as the nose on my face, and I have a big damn nose at that.
Allowing or making them do it makes all the difference, if you were able to understand the post above. How hard can it be? I t seems very hard for some, surprisingly. Material for the next post, Coquin?
Sconnie, your point is quite right and fatal to the argument. The argument, consistently applied, says that participation in anything to which the risk of death attaches (e.g., driving a car, leaving your house, *not* leaving your house, etc.), no matter how small or how *unintended* that risk (which not the same as *unforeseen*), amounts to participation in a death lottery, which amounts to participation in murder. But it doesn't. Life is essentially a (mandatory!) death lottery (and every one of us will win the lottery at some point); but that is very different from a murder lottery. And no, making a death (or murder) lottery voluntary vs. mandatory does not make any difference as to its being morally permissible or not.
But then life is immoral, because pretty much everything in life is a death lottery, even though most of the time we would presumably wish that, e.g., eating dinner or hugging grandma was just eating dinner or hugging grandma, and not in fact also a death lottery (notwithstanding that most of the time we don't realize that it is or advert to the fact that it is).
In other words, anything goes, David? So if I keep administering you jabs every 2-3 months, I am not sure which one will kill you, at the end. So, I am a good guy as I try to prevent you from dying from a NATURAL infection, in which I will succeed, according to $cience. I feel relieved, and you end up dead for the greater good, whatever it might be in this particular case.
If all "anti-vaxxers" made such deranged arguments, I'd probably have to go join the covidians. Don't shoot yerself in the foot, bro. Friendly fire can be just as deadly as enemy fire.
I appreciate the logical way you expressed this sentiment that I have been struggling with for months now. As a state employee of one of the most jabbed states in the US, I am disgusted in state leadership and even fellow employees who are acting as propagandists to push these deadly jabs. We were all asked to add a blurb to our email signatures promoting the toxic juice for everyone 5 and up and it turns my stomach to see it at the bottom of most emails I receive every day. I have long thought that everyone complying with this ask is complicit in crimes against humanity but you said it better: they are morally guilty of participation in murder.
This is my own email signature quote:
"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."
~ Krishnamurti
Love it! I wonder how long it would take someone to ask/tell me to remove it if I added that to my signature instead. I work for a "health" department so everyone is very proud of their contributions to they psyop that is the last two years.
I have the same stomach turning every time my superintendent promotes the vaccine for children. This article made it very clear why I feel they are committing a crime.
Not if they don't know about the death rate. But if they do, yes.
There is now absolutely no excuse for being wilfully ignorant of the harms these toxic jabs cause.
Exactly. At what point is the ignorance willful? This coercion and propaganda is completely devoid of informed consent.
When the risks are explained to them by awakened souls and they are ignored.
When we are told that Vaers and the Yellow card systems are just full of false reports by antivaxxers, without even a cursory check.
When they refuse to even consider another viewpoint than the one CNN / BBC / WAPO / Guardian told them was correct.
When they have not applied even a modicum of critical thought throughout when witnessing the daily about turns and illogical rulings from government. When they saw the "elites" repeatedly ignoring all of the rules they placed on the rest of us.
Something which has been glaringly obvious to anyone with a single functioning brain cell.
When they hated the jab because of Trump, but now love the jab because of Fauci and force others to take the poison.
THEREFORE it is now wilful ignorance for a huge segment of the population and only the effects on those close to them might awaken them from their stupor.
I know multiple people who have myocarditis & are still in complete denial, even though their symptoms started within days of their 2nd or 3rd dose.
I am so scared of them getting another dose.
Then another. And another. And another.
Until it literally kills them.
Or they die of cognitive dissonance.
Whatever comes first.
Amen to all that you've said.
Actually- no. Reread the article. “Rate” is odds and odds has nothing to do with moral culpability. Whether you imagine .0005% or more, you are accepting the death lottery. So you share in moral culpability. Added to that was the discussion on the child’s trust that the adults did the moral calculus on his or her behalf. Every authority in a child’s life that makes a decision for said child or children is engaging in a moral calculus and so inherits the consequence. If you are responsible for someone’s life and fail to do due diligence, you are guilty of tge most cavalier murder: “Ah- who can be bothered figuring this out. Hope you aren’t unlucky, kid! What can I tell ya! Life stinks. We all die anyway. Good luck to ya!” Sociopath much?
From the article: "Mistake or Ignorance of Fact - If one is ignorant of the fact that a lottery results in the deaths of others, then it cannot be murder. In such a case, there is no knowledge constituting any type of guilty mind."
I responded to the “death rate” in your initial reply. Rate is about “how many” not “if”. From the article: “This does not, however, include people with knowledge that some die from C19 vaccines in “rare” adverse outcomes. Belief that deaths resulting from the C19 vaccine are “rare” is not ignorance of fact. If you know it is “rare”, then you know that death does in-fact occur. The meaning of “rare” in context of percentages does not matter. The odds of the lottery may be high or low, but it is a death lottery nonetheless; and participation in the lottery is willful participation in murder.” End quote
On October 22, 2020, the FDA advisory committee panel already had "death" on their list of possible injection outcomes... before they even "authorized" the injections for "emergency use".
The relevant slide flashes by around the 2:33:40 mark...
https://youtu.be/1XTiL9rUpkg
And that is exactly the part of the article that I disagree with.
I am not sure what exactly "the part" is. Are you saying that they did NOT know that death was a potential outcome? When ALL the previously attempted mRNA animal trials FAILED? Because the animals DIED....
Excellent essay and perfectly stated.
Thank you. Thank you for speaking for the lost, and the destroyed; it has been so painful watching the world turn away as if they didn’t exist. Your essay brought tears.
Yes, this piece touches my heart and your comment does also.
Thanks for such a rational exposition of a usually provocative (emotionally) subject. Its maddening, really mind blowing for me. I’m GenX- classic, posterchild GenX. We got ALL the tools to deal with this moment. All the literature, like Jackson, to the nonfiction we studied, from grammar to high school, nevermind after that, was about understanding how the horrors of the 20th C could happen. So I watched all this take place wondering if really I am in a matrix because certainly everyone sees/knows/understands right? Right?!!!! Or is it Invasion of the Body Snatchers that’s occurred? Like WTF man! Wake up! But I am screaming into the abyss, apparently.
I'm also GenX but on the Millennial cusp (Oregon Trail generation is the best description I've found thus far for my micro generation haha) and I also have no idea what happened to my people, or the youth of today. We were hippies and punk rockers who didn't trust the man, the establishment, or anyone else for that matter. Then I moved to Vermont 20+ years ago and I thought I had found my people: free thinkers who love nature and want to create a life of at least some semblance of self-sufficiency. But the virtue signaling and covid fear porn have gripped the old hippies in a way I could never have predicted! And who would have thought that the drug of choice for both the hippies and punk rockers would end up being an experimental pharmaceutical? Man, I really just want off this planet some days.
The lack of intellectual curiosity, independent and critical thinking and general rebelliousness of the youth has been a great disappointment for me!
Agreed. Unrecognizable. For quite a while I wondered where they came from. Maybe cloned in labs? They bear no resemblance to “organic youth” I’ve known, or read, in my time till now.
Lol- I just cracked myself up. “I want my youth free range, dammit!”
What a joy to learn about you and your work. Yes to all of the above. Glad to have found you. A recommendation by bad catittude. Substack is one of the best things that's happened to media in the last 2 years.
Excerpt from The Lottery (1948):
_________________________________
“They do say,” Mr. Adams said to Old Man Warner, who stood next to him, “that over in the north village they’re talking of giving up the lottery.”
Old Man Warner snorted. “Pack of crazy fools,” he said. “Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them. Next thing you know, they’ll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work any more, live that way for a while. Used to be a saying about ‘Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.’ First thing you know, we’d all be eating stewed chickweed and acorns. There’s always been a lottery,” he added petulantly. “Bad enough to see young Joe Summers up there joking with everybody.”
“Some places have already quit lotteries,” Mrs. Adams said.
“Nothing but trouble in that,” Old Man Warner said stoutly. “Pack of young fools.”
_________________________________
I can see this exact conversation happening between teachers in Chicago right now: "I hear they don't make toddlers wear mask in Shelbyville and North Haverbook"
"Nothing but trouble in that"
Profound. Thank you, even though it reminded me of The Lottery one of a few stories I wouldn't have minded to NOT have read, especially at a young age.
Superb and faultless. There's probably no need to even mention the word "genocide". Yet the flagrant level of immorality imbedded in the "mass formation psychosis" (Robert Malone's term) should indicate that the sheer scale of destruction rides roughshod over any discussion of morality. This was evil incarnate.
IIRC It was Mattias Desmets term that was adopted by Robert Malone.
Thank you, Mr Harry! I didn't know that.
Also, Mattias Desmet shies away from adding "psychosis" to the term "mass formation".
He talked about why in a conversation with Robert Malone.
Thank you for the detail, Ms Rogers!
This is an absolutely brilliant way to describe vaccine mandates. Too long a read probably for those who are still "ignorant" after all this time and availability of information. What about the paid propagandists who actively suppress the information? In their case, we could allege pre-meditated murder, couldn't we? What's the sentence for that in America?
Excellent piece, elegant argument. Thank you.
Magnificent analysis!
"There should be no coercion of any kind for people to vaccinate, else those coercing others are morally guilty of participation in murder, wherever and whenever that death occurs."
This is the root of the issue. It is established beyond all doubt that C-19 mass 'vaccination' is a death lottery and the people responsible for C-19 mass 'vaccination' campaigns know that they are a death lottery. Coercing, even mandating people to buy a ticket, or multiple tickets, thus increasing one's chance of getting 'lucky', is an act of mass murder sponsored by pharmaceutical companies in an unholy alliance with our governments. Prosecuting them for what will undoubtedly amount to a global genocide against which all other national genocides combined pale in comparison (including the deaths accumulated from the prerequisite killer lockdowns) is going to be very difficult, because I doubt even the International Criminal Court will have the courage, moral fortitude, or willingness to take on board this monstrous crime.
There is no escaping the death lotteries. The complement of a death lottery is a death lottery as well. The point is transparency about your odds in the different lotteries.
Back in the summer of 2020, I came across a 232 page manual that the WHO had published, their “Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance” manual. I read the whole thing and it purported to be a guide on how world governments should surveil and respond to the eventual rollout. And on page 91 if I recall, there was a long list of many of the deadly complications and woundings we have been seeing since the rollout. I archived the manual, thankfully. A few months later, it had been wiped from the internet and all I could find was a truncated 18 page WHO Covid-19 Surveillance “manual” instead. So shameful that they knew all of these terrible effects and adverse reactions could happen so many months BEFORE the vaccines were rolled out in Dec of 2020. So shameful, it’s truly repulsive.
Have you uploaded the link to the archived 232-page manual somewhere? Link, please?
I remember having to read it, but would not have remembered that...I think it was 9th grade or so
Every person on earth knows that a tiny percentage of people will die from the pre-covid vaccines given to adults and children alike. Are we all morally guilty of participating in a death lottery pre-covid? Are we all guilty of participating in a death lottery by allowing someone else to drive a car home from our house?
Are they mandated to drive away? Are you coercing them to drive away? It is the mandate that is the problem. And yes, look into vaccines, pre-mRNA type. It's not pretty.
I have looked into it, and completely agree. And I agree about the mandate being the problem. But the author vilifies anyone who doesn't stop a vaccine that might kill a very small amount of people - which is all of the previous vaccines. I think that's a step too far.
The difference being that with previous vaccines, one has been allowed personally (or for one's children) to decline, without punishment, exclusion from society, etc. *And*, much more information has been given up front about risks, benefits, more truly informed consent.
We are not talking about a small amount of people. We are talking about all cause death being up 400% by some insurance red flags. We are talking genocide, a Vietnam War level death for the under 40 group. Start looking and you will see. Morticians cant keep up and these are non covid deaths that happen soon after vaccination. All over the world. Look at your own towns obituary page for deaths- in our paper it is easy to see a dramatic rise even there compared to previous.
I totally agree. I was just trying to make the point that Covid "vaccines" have been introduced, promoted & required in a completely different (ethically wrong) manner than all other vaccines. I am a (retired - because I declined Covid vax) nurse who was formerly injured by a flu vaccine (to the point of brain surgery) & have had issues with Hep B vaccines as well. I worked until end of September 2021. I have seen far more vaccine injury (in friends & patients) than I have Covid. This is, of course, "speculation" on my part, since documentation of such effects is rarely questioned with respect to Covid vaccines. (I live in Canada).
Super important to see VAXXED if you can. Also worthwhile to compare the vaccine schedule for kids today compared to the 1970s or even 1980's...a ridiculous number of shots are 'recommended', more like demanded when you consider schooling, sports and travel. No one considers their cumulitive effects, though I did see one physician ask at a cdc meeting last year. No was the answer to whether they consider cumulutive effects of esp. adjuvants and excipients. On the flip side, schools are now trying to avoid future liability by screening all vaccinated students who want to do sports for heart issues prior. The vaccinated are not allowed to play till that. (story at The Highwire last week). So ridiculous and tragic.
Dr. Paul Thomas in Portland worked on the cumulative effects of the CDC infant programme. A recent paper was forcibly retracted, which has also happened with other "contra-narrative" reports.
ADHD, autism, allergies reaching the epidemic proportions, among others, since Dr. Faustci ascended to the throne in 1984. What a coincidence - 1984!
Yes, I agree with all that.
But you must realize that "Previous vaccines" do not all stop transmission...like whooping cough etc....so the kids take whooping cough home to their newborn sibling....who could die. That you cannot get Tetanus anymore without Whooping cough, etc....and that there is no earthly reason any newborn on the day of birth should get a HepB vaccine?
Please don't stop thinking at a certain point. Because you are a nurse and have your eyes open, you are doubly valuable , especially if you are able to start questioning everything you think you ever knew. Go beyond please, because we need people like you. When you do, you will start to realize that much of what we were taught to believe is not supported by science. It is just that the science is hidden/censored/not published and the people who try to get the word out are banned from their professions.
Oh, absolutely. I was shocked when a grandson (in US) was given Hep B vaccine on the day he was born. It's not on the list in Ontario, Canada till Grade 7-8 (should not be then either). A copy of "Dissolving Illusions" by Suzanne Humphries awaits my reading (along with many many studies on flu shots, Covid shots, etc). I retired rather than fired for lack of Covid shot, but in most ways (other than financial).I don't regret it. The medical system and I hadn't been seeing eye to eye for years.
The amount doesn't matter. If one person is killed by forcefully administering 8 billion people with 4 shots each, that one person has been killed, plain and simple, no two ways about it.
And killing a person that didn't imminently threaten anyone's life is morally wrong at the highest degree.
But without spiritual beliefs, people turn themselves into animals and are being dealt with as such by the higher-ups.
True. I think it's deference to what or whom seems all-knowing to them, combined with that ol stockholm thang, combined with the possibility that what has been injected is acting on them, continuously or at specific times or conditions....graphene and microwaves are such an intoxicationg combination, from what little I can stand to research.
Again, it's not about "stopping a vaccine"... it's about stopping the mandates.
Also, these mRNA injections are NOT "vaccines". Using that term is deliberate and intentional brainwashing, because the vast majority of people automatically associate "safe and effective and life saving" with that term.
No it is really not a step too far. No one should be mandated to take any vaccine. Period. End of story. And parents who vaccinate their children, if they have any inkling that following the vax schedule CDC recommends results in autism, they are guilty too. Many parents do not. But some do. And schools that require the childhood vaxines are equally guilty and responsible. Full stop.
Please consider reading this substack post:
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/dissolving-my-vaxxed-illusions?s=r
Voluntary participation in a death lottery is not the issue. Being mandated to participate IS. Anyone supporting and enforcing or even encouraging such participation is guilty!
Where there is risk there MUST be choice.
Choice under duress and threat of employment termination is NOT a genuine choice.
But again, life is by definition a death lottery. It's very important not to conflate a murder lottery (including something like Russian roulette), with a death lottery (including every single thing there is that carries with it even the smallest risk of death). And many of the things that constitute a death lottery, thus defined, are not and morally speaking need not be voluntary. If (1) it was known that some action V really was safe and effective, and (2) that there was no excuse for not knowing that V really was safe and effective, and (3) it was known that omitting V was gravely dangerous, then it would make more sense to say that it's the people who forego V who are participating in a "death lottery," than the people who choose V. Indeed, this has been the precise rhetoric of the covidian cultists: people how forego the miracles vaxxes are playing Russian roulette (a deranged Australian legislator made exactly this claim with reference to the supposed need for draconian lockdowns). In short, if it were actually true that "anti-vaxxers" are just deranged lunatics who are recklessly and wantonly putting their own and others' lives in grave danger, then there wouldn't be much of a case against employing coercive measures to pressure them to do the right thing, that all reasonable people can see is the right thing. The problem for the covidian cultists is just that those are not the actual facts of the case, and it's hard to see how any reasonable person has any excuse for failing to see that those are not the actual facts of the case. (However, as we know, there has been a shockingly relentless, unscrupulous, and effective propaganda campaign, so we see what we see...) Thus the mandates are wrong, but that is a function of the particular facts of the case, not of a general principle that says that all risk must be assumed voluntarily.
I think you're confused. Are you agreeing with me? My point was indeed that what matters is that it is "this risk," i.e., the particular facts of the case in question, that are morally decisive, as opposed to the erroneous general principles advanced by CdC. Yet you seem to think that you are disagreeing with me... What is it you think I don't understand???
Sorry. I did misread your comment. We do agree. I was distracted. 🙏🏼
Now that I have seen VAXXED, with this debacle, I can say yes we are complicit. And yes, we are in a death lottery whether we choose a car, a horse, a train or a plane or to walk or bike or skateboard. Or not to go out ever and have depression and more illness just from staying indoors. We choose the benefit, as it has been explained to us, (believing and gullible souls) over the danger, or vice versa and stay home, or likely walk. This is the business of the actuary, and so this discussion is inextricably tied to money. To note here is that insurance against death operates on a very steady death rate. So, we are now in un-insurable land, which does not affect my life at this time, but will likely affect all that we do and transact.
As I assess the role of vaccines throughout my life I have had some recent revelations that cause me to suspect more of the illnesses I saw in my family and in myself (born mid 1960's) were related to the vaccinations I did receive. The poisoning agenda of humans and the land these last 40 years is becoming as plain as the nose on my face, and I have a big damn nose at that.
No. That's where informed consent comes in and not mandates.
Allowing or making them do it makes all the difference, if you were able to understand the post above. How hard can it be? I t seems very hard for some, surprisingly. Material for the next post, Coquin?
Sconnie, your point is quite right and fatal to the argument. The argument, consistently applied, says that participation in anything to which the risk of death attaches (e.g., driving a car, leaving your house, *not* leaving your house, etc.), no matter how small or how *unintended* that risk (which not the same as *unforeseen*), amounts to participation in a death lottery, which amounts to participation in murder. But it doesn't. Life is essentially a (mandatory!) death lottery (and every one of us will win the lottery at some point); but that is very different from a murder lottery. And no, making a death (or murder) lottery voluntary vs. mandatory does not make any difference as to its being morally permissible or not.
Exactly! That said, coercing anyone to participate in a death lottery when they do not wish to participate, is immoral.
But then life is immoral, because pretty much everything in life is a death lottery, even though most of the time we would presumably wish that, e.g., eating dinner or hugging grandma was just eating dinner or hugging grandma, and not in fact also a death lottery (notwithstanding that most of the time we don't realize that it is or advert to the fact that it is).
Are we coercing them? Then it's immoral. Not coercing? Not immoral.
Non sequitur. Not all coercion is immoral. Not all non-coercion is moral.
In other words, anything goes, David? So if I keep administering you jabs every 2-3 months, I am not sure which one will kill you, at the end. So, I am a good guy as I try to prevent you from dying from a NATURAL infection, in which I will succeed, according to $cience. I feel relieved, and you end up dead for the greater good, whatever it might be in this particular case.
If all "anti-vaxxers" made such deranged arguments, I'd probably have to go join the covidians. Don't shoot yerself in the foot, bro. Friendly fire can be just as deadly as enemy fire.
I figure you give up? I accept.