107 Comments
User's avatar
Devon's avatar

I appreciate the logical way you expressed this sentiment that I have been struggling with for months now. As a state employee of one of the most jabbed states in the US, I am disgusted in state leadership and even fellow employees who are acting as propagandists to push these deadly jabs. We were all asked to add a blurb to our email signatures promoting the toxic juice for everyone 5 and up and it turns my stomach to see it at the bottom of most emails I receive every day. I have long thought that everyone complying with this ask is complicit in crimes against humanity but you said it better: they are morally guilty of participation in murder.

Expand full comment
S. Nicoletta Rogers's avatar

This is my own email signature quote:

"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."

~ Krishnamurti

Expand full comment
Devon's avatar

Love it! I wonder how long it would take someone to ask/tell me to remove it if I added that to my signature instead. I work for a "health" department so everyone is very proud of their contributions to they psyop that is the last two years.

Expand full comment
Duchess's avatar

I have the same stomach turning every time my superintendent promotes the vaccine for children. This article made it very clear why I feel they are committing a crime.

Expand full comment
Sconnie's avatar

Not if they don't know about the death rate. But if they do, yes.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

There is now absolutely no excuse for being wilfully ignorant of the harms these toxic jabs cause.

Expand full comment
Devon's avatar

Exactly. At what point is the ignorance willful? This coercion and propaganda is completely devoid of informed consent.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

When the risks are explained to them by awakened souls and they are ignored.

When we are told that Vaers and the Yellow card systems are just full of false reports by antivaxxers, without even a cursory check.

When they refuse to even consider another viewpoint than the one CNN / BBC / WAPO / Guardian told them was correct.

When they have not applied even a modicum of critical thought throughout when witnessing the daily about turns and illogical rulings from government. When they saw the "elites" repeatedly ignoring all of the rules they placed on the rest of us.

Something which has been glaringly obvious to anyone with a single functioning brain cell.

When they hated the jab because of Trump, but now love the jab because of Fauci and force others to take the poison.

THEREFORE it is now wilful ignorance for a huge segment of the population and only the effects on those close to them might awaken them from their stupor.

Expand full comment
MN's avatar

I know multiple people who have myocarditis & are still in complete denial, even though their symptoms started within days of their 2nd or 3rd dose.

I am so scared of them getting another dose.

Then another. And another. And another.

Until it literally kills them.

Or they die of cognitive dissonance.

Whatever comes first.

Expand full comment
Marta Staszak's avatar

Amen to all that you've said.

Expand full comment
Dorothy Unleashed's avatar

Actually- no. Reread the article. “Rate” is odds and odds has nothing to do with moral culpability. Whether you imagine .0005% or more, you are accepting the death lottery. So you share in moral culpability. Added to that was the discussion on the child’s trust that the adults did the moral calculus on his or her behalf. Every authority in a child’s life that makes a decision for said child or children is engaging in a moral calculus and so inherits the consequence. If you are responsible for someone’s life and fail to do due diligence, you are guilty of tge most cavalier murder: “Ah- who can be bothered figuring this out. Hope you aren’t unlucky, kid! What can I tell ya! Life stinks. We all die anyway. Good luck to ya!” Sociopath much?

Expand full comment
Sconnie's avatar

From the article: "Mistake or Ignorance of Fact - If one is ignorant of the fact that a lottery results in the deaths of others, then it cannot be murder. In such a case, there is no knowledge constituting any type of guilty mind."

Expand full comment
Dorothy Unleashed's avatar

I responded to the “death rate” in your initial reply. Rate is about “how many” not “if”. From the article: “This does not, however, include people with knowledge that some die from C19 vaccines in “rare” adverse outcomes.  Belief that deaths resulting from the C19 vaccine are “rare” is not ignorance of fact.  If you know it is “rare”, then you know that death does in-fact occur.  The meaning of “rare” in context of percentages does not matter.  The odds of the lottery may be high or low, but it is a death lottery nonetheless; and participation in the lottery is willful participation in murder.” End quote

Expand full comment
S. Nicoletta Rogers's avatar

On October 22, 2020, the FDA advisory committee panel already had "death" on their list of possible injection outcomes... before they even "authorized" the injections for "emergency use".

The relevant slide flashes by around the 2:33:40 mark...

https://youtu.be/1XTiL9rUpkg

Expand full comment
Sconnie's avatar

And that is exactly the part of the article that I disagree with.

Expand full comment
S. Nicoletta Rogers's avatar

I am not sure what exactly "the part" is. Are you saying that they did NOT know that death was a potential outcome? When ALL the previously attempted mRNA animal trials FAILED? Because the animals DIED....

Expand full comment
Maria N's avatar

Excellent essay and perfectly stated.

Expand full comment
Dorothy Unleashed's avatar

Thanks for such a rational exposition of a usually provocative (emotionally) subject. Its maddening, really mind blowing for me. I’m GenX- classic, posterchild GenX. We got ALL the tools to deal with this moment. All the literature, like Jackson, to the nonfiction we studied, from grammar to high school, nevermind after that, was about understanding how the horrors of the 20th C could happen. So I watched all this take place wondering if really I am in a matrix because certainly everyone sees/knows/understands right? Right?!!!! Or is it Invasion of the Body Snatchers that’s occurred? Like WTF man! Wake up! But I am screaming into the abyss, apparently.

Expand full comment
Devon's avatar

I'm also GenX but on the Millennial cusp (Oregon Trail generation is the best description I've found thus far for my micro generation haha) and I also have no idea what happened to my people, or the youth of today. We were hippies and punk rockers who didn't trust the man, the establishment, or anyone else for that matter. Then I moved to Vermont 20+ years ago and I thought I had found my people: free thinkers who love nature and want to create a life of at least some semblance of self-sufficiency. But the virtue signaling and covid fear porn have gripped the old hippies in a way I could never have predicted! And who would have thought that the drug of choice for both the hippies and punk rockers would end up being an experimental pharmaceutical? Man, I really just want off this planet some days.

Expand full comment
Joel Smalley's avatar

The lack of intellectual curiosity, independent and critical thinking and general rebelliousness of the youth has been a great disappointment for me!

Expand full comment
Dorothy Unleashed's avatar

Agreed. Unrecognizable. For quite a while I wondered where they came from. Maybe cloned in labs? They bear no resemblance to “organic youth” I’ve known, or read, in my time till now.

Expand full comment
Dorothy Unleashed's avatar

Lol- I just cracked myself up. “I want my youth free range, dammit!”

Expand full comment
Suzanne's avatar

Thank you. Thank you for speaking for the lost, and the destroyed; it has been so painful watching the world turn away as if they didn’t exist. Your essay brought tears.

Expand full comment
Shelle's avatar

Yes, this piece touches my heart and your comment does also.

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

What a joy to learn about you and your work. Yes to all of the above. Glad to have found you. A recommendation by bad catittude. Substack is one of the best things that's happened to media in the last 2 years.

Expand full comment
Michael DAmbrosio's avatar

Excerpt from The Lottery (1948):

_________________________________

“They do say,” Mr. Adams said to Old Man Warner, who stood next to him, “that over in the north village they’re talking of giving up the lottery.”

Old Man Warner snorted. “Pack of crazy fools,” he said. “Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them. Next thing you know, they’ll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work any more, live that way for a while. Used to be a saying about ‘Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.’ First thing you know, we’d all be eating stewed chickweed and acorns. There’s always been a lottery,” he added petulantly. “Bad enough to see young Joe Summers up there joking with everybody.”

“Some places have already quit lotteries,” Mrs. Adams said.

“Nothing but trouble in that,” Old Man Warner said stoutly. “Pack of young fools.”

_________________________________

I can see this exact conversation happening between teachers in Chicago right now: "I hear they don't make toddlers wear mask in Shelbyville and North Haverbook"

"Nothing but trouble in that"

Expand full comment
Holly Champaign's avatar

Profound. Thank you, even though it reminded me of The Lottery one of a few stories I wouldn't have minded to NOT have read, especially at a young age.

Expand full comment
Rick's avatar

Superb and faultless. There's probably no need to even mention the word "genocide". Yet the flagrant level of immorality imbedded in the "mass formation psychosis" (Robert Malone's term) should indicate that the sheer scale of destruction rides roughshod over any discussion of morality. This was evil incarnate.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

IIRC It was Mattias Desmets term that was adopted by Robert Malone.

Expand full comment
Rick's avatar

Thank you, Mr Harry! I didn't know that.

Expand full comment
S. Nicoletta Rogers's avatar

Also, Mattias Desmet shies away from adding "psychosis" to the term "mass formation".

He talked about why in a conversation with Robert Malone.

Expand full comment
Rick's avatar

Thank you for the detail, Ms Rogers!

Expand full comment
Joel Smalley's avatar

This is an absolutely brilliant way to describe vaccine mandates. Too long a read probably for those who are still "ignorant" after all this time and availability of information. What about the paid propagandists who actively suppress the information? In their case, we could allege pre-meditated murder, couldn't we? What's the sentence for that in America?

Expand full comment
Veritas's avatar

Excellent piece, elegant argument. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Magnificent analysis!

Expand full comment
Jaime Jessop's avatar

"There should be no coercion of any kind for people to vaccinate, else those coercing others are morally guilty of participation in murder, wherever and whenever that death occurs."

This is the root of the issue. It is established beyond all doubt that C-19 mass 'vaccination' is a death lottery and the people responsible for C-19 mass 'vaccination' campaigns know that they are a death lottery. Coercing, even mandating people to buy a ticket, or multiple tickets, thus increasing one's chance of getting 'lucky', is an act of mass murder sponsored by pharmaceutical companies in an unholy alliance with our governments. Prosecuting them for what will undoubtedly amount to a global genocide against which all other national genocides combined pale in comparison (including the deaths accumulated from the prerequisite killer lockdowns) is going to be very difficult, because I doubt even the International Criminal Court will have the courage, moral fortitude, or willingness to take on board this monstrous crime.

Expand full comment
anacara's avatar

Great essay. Also, it woukd be immoral even if they were harmless. Our bodies are our own and no one has the right to violate them.

Expand full comment
cm27874's avatar

There is no escaping the death lotteries. The complement of a death lottery is a death lottery as well. The point is transparency about your odds in the different lotteries.

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

Back in the summer of 2020, I came across a 232 page manual that the WHO had published, their “Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance” manual. I read the whole thing and it purported to be a guide on how world governments should surveil and respond to the eventual rollout. And on page 91 if I recall, there was a long list of many of the deadly complications and woundings we have been seeing since the rollout. I archived the manual, thankfully. A few months later, it had been wiped from the internet and all I could find was a truncated 18 page WHO Covid-19 Surveillance “manual” instead. So shameful that they knew all of these terrible effects and adverse reactions could happen so many months BEFORE the vaccines were rolled out in Dec of 2020. So shameful, it’s truly repulsive.

Expand full comment
isles of Boshen's avatar

Have you uploaded the link to the archived 232-page manual somewhere? Link, please?

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

I remember having to read it, but would not have remembered that...I think it was 9th grade or so

Expand full comment