This explains the cruel insistence upon inhumane jab mandates by Hospitals all over the country. It was a financial decision masquerading as public health. With any luck the resulting carnage of deaths and harms wrought by the experimental EUA jabs tweaked the consciences of at least a few hospital administrators here and there. Extensive jail terms would do a much better job at tweaking those consciences.
I think with the glorified search engine we call AI, it will become much easier to represent oneself. Perhaps in the future we can replace moron judges with it too.
I hear the fear, but aren't judges already mostly glorified robots?
Same with doctors... They are already robots that follow orders. Replace them with AI. At least people are more apr to question AI than a smug sociopathic asshole in a white coat.
John, Talk about a smack up into the reality sphere in one substack!!! Of course I had to look up Pro Se…and that got me in the ballpark of the definition of Pro se”. Your substack is so clearly written on how exactly this has worked in the lawyer world. Your summary as I have observed gets me into another realm of reality. I have know something was off…but not as clearly as you addressed. Thank you is not enough. And I know many that will find value in your explanation!!!!!! God Bless you and your talent you share with your writings after a gazillion hours of research
Since the settlement was the same for all fired employees, despite losing incomes of different amounts, this was a Class Action, not a Group Action. So I'm confused how MGB could offer to settle with a minimum # of plaintiffs. I was the holdout in a Class Action in which there was no settlement if all plaintiffs didn't settle. Did MGB get the attorney to agree that prior to settlement, he would drop all plaintiffs that refused to settle? That's Legal Malpractice.
He very likely did. This case could not be a class action because of a lack of commonality and typicality required for class actions. Also, his small office firm would not pass the adequacy test either. Under rule 23, it cannot be class certified. So he ran it like a class action, but it was not a class action. Hall versus Hall in 2018 in the Supreme Court emphatically stated that plaintiffs in a consolidated case should retain their unique and individual attributes. That absolutely did not happen in this case. Is that malpractice? No. It’s not. But there are aspects of this case that are very highly likely malpractice. However, you will likely never see the evidence of that. I am shocked. that any of these 200+ plaintiffs have not filed a grievance with the board bar overseers. Or, maybe they did and we do not know it. We would not know it. This whole case is such a mess. And all of the mess that it is bends to the favor of the biggest recipient of NIH $ annually in grant funding to the tune of more than $1 billion a year. And that is far less than what they take in medicare and Medicaid each year.
I'm as ruthless as you, John. I will be able to live rent free in my London apartment because I discovered my landlord had committed fraud. He's having a nervous breakdown. Not my problem.
I stand with Shakespeare on lawyers.
I'm with Cicero, but add lawyers to politicians.
Politicians are not born. They are excreted.
This explains the cruel insistence upon inhumane jab mandates by Hospitals all over the country. It was a financial decision masquerading as public health. With any luck the resulting carnage of deaths and harms wrought by the experimental EUA jabs tweaked the consciences of at least a few hospital administrators here and there. Extensive jail terms would do a much better job at tweaking those consciences.
Money plays a huge part in this immense travesty.
My only remaining question is, “For how long has this been going on?”
All of these places are criminals. They're still using toxic Remdesevir. https://brownstone.org/articles/why-are-hospitals-still-using-remdesivir/
Following orders was never a valid excuse. They'll face justice once we have a true human rights court like Nuremberg.
As for this law bullshit, legalese is the brainwashing that shields liars and thieves, including lawyers and judges.
Language also shapes perception. Using mumbo jumbo keeps them from understanding reality. This bullshit is also foisted on juries.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/alphabet-vs-the-goddess
I think with the glorified search engine we call AI, it will become much easier to represent oneself. Perhaps in the future we can replace moron judges with it too.
I hear the fear, but aren't judges already mostly glorified robots?
Same with doctors... They are already robots that follow orders. Replace them with AI. At least people are more apr to question AI than a smug sociopathic asshole in a white coat.
Please watch 1961 4 hour film Judgement at Nuremberg. OUTSTANDING!
John, Talk about a smack up into the reality sphere in one substack!!! Of course I had to look up Pro Se…and that got me in the ballpark of the definition of Pro se”. Your substack is so clearly written on how exactly this has worked in the lawyer world. Your summary as I have observed gets me into another realm of reality. I have know something was off…but not as clearly as you addressed. Thank you is not enough. And I know many that will find value in your explanation!!!!!! God Bless you and your talent you share with your writings after a gazillion hours of research
keep it coming John, a delight in evil inacted, the hell created, but good good insights for us all.
Since the settlement was the same for all fired employees, despite losing incomes of different amounts, this was a Class Action, not a Group Action. So I'm confused how MGB could offer to settle with a minimum # of plaintiffs. I was the holdout in a Class Action in which there was no settlement if all plaintiffs didn't settle. Did MGB get the attorney to agree that prior to settlement, he would drop all plaintiffs that refused to settle? That's Legal Malpractice.
It is not a class action. Read the prior articles. It explains it there.
John,
What are your thoughts regarding David Ransil's claim asserting the plaintiffs' attorney committing "Legal Malpractice"?
He very likely did. This case could not be a class action because of a lack of commonality and typicality required for class actions. Also, his small office firm would not pass the adequacy test either. Under rule 23, it cannot be class certified. So he ran it like a class action, but it was not a class action. Hall versus Hall in 2018 in the Supreme Court emphatically stated that plaintiffs in a consolidated case should retain their unique and individual attributes. That absolutely did not happen in this case. Is that malpractice? No. It’s not. But there are aspects of this case that are very highly likely malpractice. However, you will likely never see the evidence of that. I am shocked. that any of these 200+ plaintiffs have not filed a grievance with the board bar overseers. Or, maybe they did and we do not know it. We would not know it. This whole case is such a mess. And all of the mess that it is bends to the favor of the biggest recipient of NIH $ annually in grant funding to the tune of more than $1 billion a year. And that is far less than what they take in medicare and Medicaid each year.
I'm as ruthless as you, John. I will be able to live rent free in my London apartment because I discovered my landlord had committed fraud. He's having a nervous breakdown. Not my problem.
I AM []≡[] so familiar with attacks on us pro se litigants. Many Blessings, old friend.
https://lenkinder.substack.com/p/guiness-record-trial-continuances
Many Blessings,
Geoff Wexler
Deut 1:11, 3 John 1:2
¬🦅 Ånti-ĐØ$•§ier🕊
𝕎ℍ𝕆-to-𝕊𝕋𝕆ℙ℠
https://open.substack.com/pub/covidandvaxfaqs/p/top-25-incriminating-patents
#Covidinjured #TurboCancer
https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/gw-surviving-covid
Be your own lawyer find out how:
https://www.brighteon.com/26fcdcaa-4efd-4d38-8e6f-8d859fa51297
On the other hand, according to my realtor sibs, customers come from hell too. It’s hard being a light in a dark world.