Scienter, not science

To know is to have a guilty mind

After reading C19 “vaccine” - the cause of causes, many asked, “What can we do about it?”

This article is meant to empower people to regain sovereignty as individuals and as The People, the citizenry. Although this article is grounded in English Common Law, every sovereign person in the world should adapt and adopt the path laid out herein to hold their governments accountable.

Long articles can be tedious, especially if you don’t know what is coming. Here is what is coming: explanation of grand juries, oligarchical tyranny, evidence of C19 injection deaths, evidence of fraud in death certificates to cover up C19 injection deaths, evidence of fraud in over-counting C19 deaths, evidence of solicitation through coercion by medical boards to ensure doctors commit the fraud, evidence of conspiracy through $Millions in grants and other funding from oligarchs to ensure medical boards solicit doctors to commit fraud, and the following plan to expose and prosecute it.

Before the end of this article, you will:

1. better understand a legal framework for action,

2. learn the identities of individuals who may have committed crimes against The People,

3. become aware of a criminal investigative process available to The People in some jurisdictions, and

4. possess pre-written letters to criminal actors demanding remedy by amendment, else face justice.

In civil litigation, a plaintiff brings to a court a case or controversy against a defendant. In criminal law, the government, representing The People, brings a case against a defendant. Criminal complaints are often docketed as The People v [defendant]. If members of the government engage in unlawful and conspiratorial conduct, who brings the complaint? If the only avenue of criminal investigation and indictment of government officials is the government itself, then The People would, at times, be left without justice, ergo, in throes of injustice.

---

On Grand Juries -

From early 13th century in England came the Magna Carta Libertatum, the Great Charter of Freedom, a promise to The People regarding property rights and individual freedoms. Though the Charter does not explicitly call for a grand jury schema, specifically, England shortly after evolved the grand jury in the 13th century.

Grand juries in early England functioned as both an accusatory body presenting indictments and as a trial jury body deciding guilt. Later in England, and then in USA, grand juries were brought to solely perform investigative and accusatory functions. A grand jury’s end result is an indictment or no indictment. Thus, the grand jury’s function is not to seek conviction, but rather a determination of probable cause for indictment. Is there enough evidence to indict?

In this capacity, a grand jury acts both as sword and aegis. As a sword, a grand jury pursues investigation and indictment of crimes. As an aegis, a grand jury prevents the government from unjustifiably prosecuting and persecuting citizens whom government officials may selectively target unjustly.

The reason this article recommends grand juries is that the death certificate database from Massachusetts is in a district that still employs grand juries. Grand juries are built into US jurisprudence by the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution.

---

On Oligarchies -

Man behaved 800 years ago similarly to how he does today. Individuals usurped power, acted as tyrants, and believed their narcissistic ideologies would create a utopian society, if only they had total control of all people. Thomas Aquinas explained much of this to the King of Cyprus in De Regno.

Si igitur regimen iniustum per unum tantum fiat qui sua commoda ex regimine quaerat, non autem bonum multitudinis sibi subiectae, talis rector tyrannus vocatur, nomine a fortitudine derivato, quia scilicet per potentiam opprimit, non per iustitiam regit: unde et apud antiquos potentes quique tyranni vocabantur. Si vero iniustum regimen non per unum fiat, sed per plures, siquidem per paucos, oligarchia vocatur, id est principatus paucorum, quando scilicet pauci propter divitias opprimunt plebem, sola pluralitate a tyranno differentes. Si vero iniquum regimen exerceatur per multos, democratia nuncupatur, id est potentatus populi, quando scilicet populus plebeiorum per potentiam multitudinis opprimit divites. Sic enim populus totus erit quasi unus tyrannus.

De regno ad regem Cypri, Thomas Aquinas, Ch. 2. n. 11

If, therefore, the regime is unjust, made so by the one and only ruler, who seeks interests from the regime for himself, not, however, for the good of The People whom he subjugated, then such a ruler is called a “tyrant,” a label derived through force, because clearly it comes by oppressive power, not by just rule: whence ancients called the all-powerful “tyrants.” If the unjust regime is not made so by one, but by many, or by a few, it is called an oligarchy, which is a principality regime of the few, where clearly the few oppress The People on account of riches, only different from the tyrant in plurality. If, indeed, the unjust regime acting as many, named “democracy,” that is, power of The People, whence the common populace many oppress the rich by force. So, The People in total will be as one tyrant.

On Kingship to the King of Cyprus, Thomas Aquinas, Ch. 2. n. 11 (Translated by Coquin de Chien, April 2022)

The importance of this paragraph from Aquinas cannot be overstated. It is paraphrased by many that Aquinas added, “Oligarchies degenerate into tyranny more easily than monarchies do.” Monarchs are generally raised to believe they have a responsibility to make decisions of economy and war for the benefit of The Kingdom in symbiosis with The People (i.e., all of society), the Subjects of the King. Not all monarchs act benevolently. Some act tyrannically. The odds of resultant tyranny, however, are much higher in oligarchy than in monarchy because oligarchs rise in power to fiduciary responsibility to the corporation, to the company, or to their own personal wealth.

The stakeholders of a corporation are shareholders. In this schema, there is a disconnect between The People (i.e., all of society) and the oligarchs. Goals and objectives are not aligned between the oligarch and The People like they are between the King and The People. Each oligarch is apt to shirk responsibility to The People believing the other oligarchs should bear that responsibility or that such a responsibility is not his fiduciary duty. In oligarchies, power begets money and money begets power without genuine regard for society.

The current year 2022 is no different than Aquinas described 800 years ago. The question remains - what can be done about the oligarchs? The collective wisdom of philosophers and authors merged into the Constitution of the United Kingdom, The Constitution of Australia, the Constitution of New Zealand, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the Constitution of the United States of America is all you need. The overlap among these nations is nearly complete. There are but a few differences, one being that grand juries still available to the citizens of the United States.

---

Massachusetts is again at the fore due to the availability of detailed evidence in the death certificate database. Please consider acting on the information herein regardless of where you are. Add your name to a letter and send it. The crimes listed herein are federal crimes against all citizens of USA.

Although Common Law is used for explanatory purposes, US federal statutory law is relied upon to bring action, through warning of grand jury investigation for federal felonies of fraud, deprivation of rights, homicide, and other crimes. Death certificates must be amended, else their signatories run the risk of federal felony criminal accountability.

---

Introduction

The system of medicine in Massachusetts and elsewhere has become ensnared in a conspiracy that begins with fraud, yet results in homicide on a mass scale.

Medical examiners, in signing death certificates containing fraudulent information, did engage and continue to engage in unlawful acts of commission and omission. Medical board CEO’s did engage and continue to engage in the crime of solicitation of federal felonies. As these acts led to the deaths of many, the crimes rise to involuntary manslaughter, in the case of the underlying crime being a misdemeanor, or felony murder, in the case of the underlying crime being a felony, which most are.

Common Law

A basic understanding of criminal law is provided in order for the reader to understand and connect the evidence and acts laid out in the body of this article. Prosecutors must prove all elements of a crime for a defendant to be found guilty. Elements, generally, include:

1. Mens rea (a state of mind, or intent)

2. Actus reus (an act committed or omitted by the defendant)

3. Causation (the defendant’s act caused resultant harm)

4. Concurrence (mens rea and actus reus occurred within a reasonable time period such that they are connected)

5. Injury (an injury did in-fact occur)

States of mind can be negligent, reckless, knowing, or purposeful. The level of intent required for conviction depends on the state or federal statute applied. It is up to a jury to decide whether the evidence presented by the prosecution rises to a level of completion of each element including the intent element or elements.

Common Law fraud is defined as the intentional misrepresentation of material facts presented to and relied upon by another party to his detriment.

Applying the aforementioned general list to the crime of Common Law fraud shows that the prosecution must prove the defendant:

1. knew that the representation was false at the time he made the representation and intended that the representation cause the other party to rely upon it to his detriment. “knew” and “intended” are states of mind. Telling a joke or an embellished anecdote are knowingly false statements, but lack the intent to defraud and would not satisfy this element.

2. made a false representation of a material past or present fact. The defendant must know that the representation he made is false. If he believes it to be true, then this element cannot be satisfied. It must be material to the case. It cannot be extraneous or impertinent to the situation.

3. made a representation that caused the other party to rely upon it to his detriment. It must be shown that the other party would not have been injured but for the reliance on the defendant’s representation.

4. knew at the time he made the representation that it was false. If the defendant learned that his representation was false after the other party’s reliance and action, then this element is not satisfied.

5. did indeed injure the other party. If the other party did rely upon the misrepresentation and no harm came of the misrepresentation, then fraud has not been completed. Perhaps attempted fraud or conspiracy to commit fraud would otherwise be considered. However, without the injury, the fraud itself has not occurred.

---

Federal grand juries will eventually be convened or US Attorney or state District Attorney investigations will eventually occur with regard to the fraud and homicide associated with C19 data and the use of C19 gene modification injectable biological products. One such petition has been made in the United States District Court, District of Oregon, Portland Division, Case No.: 3:22-cv-356-HZ.

This article and the letters embedded within it serve as notice to specific people. Notice imparts knowledge and voids the defence of ignorance of fact or ignorance of law. Id est, by presenting the bad actors with knowledge of their misrepresentations, they must act to remedy or amend prior statements in death certificates, else be in jeopardy of conviction of federal felony crimes.

---

The Scienter Thesis

Scienter is the mens rea of fraud, among other crimes. It is the intent to deceive with purpose and to manipulate the recipient of the misrepresentation. Scienter is knowledge that one’s act of commission or omission is criminal in nature.

This article and the letters contained herein provide the scienter to the actors for the future prosecution of these actors should they refuse to amend the death certificates. Each individual bad actor would be wise to contact a personal attorney to discuss the content of each letter they receive. Bad actors should not rely upon organizational superiors for coaching in legal matters. They should not believe that the government will have their backs. Facts will be decided by a jury, not by the government. The People demand justice.

---

The “vaccin” Search

When looking for causes of death, the concatenated column of all associated ICD-10 codes, which is the last column MD of the death certificate database, is the best place to start.

A web search of “ICD-10 codes vaccine vaccination” led to two groups that would seem to include the C19 gene modification injectable biological product. T50B is “Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of viral vaccines.” T50Z is “Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of other vaccines and biological substances.”

A search of the death certificate database for T50B and T50Z produced nil instances of either of these two code groups.

Refusing to believe there was no mention of the injections in the entire year of 2021, a string search was then conducted in the Cause of Death (COD) narrative columns in which the medical examiner may write words instead of codes.

The next step was a search for words “vaccine” or “vaccination” to see if any were listed. The death certificate narrative fields (spreadsheet columns) are:

• CODIA = Immediate cause of death

• CODIB = Intermediate/Underlying cause of death

• CODIC = Intermediate/Underlying cause of death

• CODID = Intermediate/Underlying cause of death

• CONDII = Other significant conditions contributing to death

The search for the string “vaccin” was performed on the above narrative fields. In 2021 and 2022 to date, there are are only 20 records that mention “vaccin”. The results are shown in groups of five, each followed by comments.

Comments:

• 2021; #9150; 84yo Female - Dementia for years and chronic urinary tract infections. Died 5 days after Dose 2 of C19 injection. In those 5 days, she experienced acute UTI, delirium, fever, and mental status changes. Few challenge the cause of death of an 84yo woman with dementia. The narrative columns list the C19 injection as a cause of death. The ICD-10 codes do not. This is either an error or crime of omission. The difference is scienter, or knowledge (aka intent). Dr. John Worden in Gardner, MA deserves a letter of notice of criminal liability for omission. Scienter would then exist. Worden should then amend the death certificate to include the proper ICD-10 code, else be in violation of 18 USC § 287 “False, fictitious or fraudulent claims” or perhaps other federal and state statutes. All death certificates are reported to the CDC, a federal agency.

• 2021; #11199; 60yo Male - this record is the one and only mention of ICD-10 codes found regarding injectable products in the entirety of death certificates from 2015-2022 in Massachusetts. Y590 “Other and unspecified vaccines and biological substances; Viral vaccines” and T881 “Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified” were both entered on this death certificate. Kudos to Dr. Rebecca Dedrick for completing this death certificate without omission. Ideopathic = relating to no known cause. Ideopathic thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia is known to occur as a result of the C19 injection. Shown in C19 “vaccine” - the cause of causes, thrombocytopenia in 2021 was up 24% to 43% over expected values. It is also evident that no screenings are done for the C19 injections, which, in itself, is a criminal act. This decedent had hypertensive and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, conditions in the wheelhouse of C19 injection injuries, and yet he was injected anyway and died only days later. Why would someone inject him? 134 thrombocytopenia deaths occurred in 2021 in Massachusetts, which was 26 to 40 in excess of expected. Attributing the excess to the C19 injection and extrapolating across USA by population percentage yields 1,274 to 1,960 excess thrombocytopenia associated deaths from C19 injection. This one small category alone is enough to shut down the C19 injection program. Keeping this hidden, once scienter exists, is a crime.

• 2021; #12117; 85yo Female - Dementia for years. Days after C19 injection presented sepsis, aspiration, and hyponatremia. Died the week after injection. Few ask questions when an 85yo woman with dementia dies. C19 injection was mentioned in COD narratives, but omitted in ICD-10 codes. Dr. Kristen Schaefer of Danvers deserves a notice of criminal liability, which provides scienter. She may amend the death certificate to include Y590 and T881, else be violation of 18 USC § 287. After she receives notice, scienter exists.

• 2021; #15403; 62yo Female - Brain hemorrhage and thrombocytopenia. Died 11 days after C19 injection. Dr. Julie Hull of Boston deserves a letter of notice for criminal omission of a material fact from the ICD-10 code list. She has opportunity to amend the death certificate to include Y590 and T881, else be in violation of 18 USC § 287. Scienter will exist after receipt of the letter.

• 2021; #16835; 67yo Female - Plethora of underlying health issues including prior DVT (deep vein thrombosis - clot likely in the calf) and diabetes. Received C19 injection and died shortly after. Given the drug use, heart problems, clots, and other maladies, few would challenge this death certificate. I219 “Acute myocardial infarction, unspecified” was listed first. C19 injection was mentioned in COD narrative field, and omitted in ICD-10 codes. Dr. Andrew Elin deserves a letter notifying him of criminal lability 18 USC § 287 for an act of omission and giving him the opportunity to remedy the omission by amending the death certificate to include Y590 and T881.

Of these first five, three were in their 60’s, two were thrombocytopenia, and two elderly dementia patients who died shortly after C19 injection. Many or most of these people were obviously not likely to survive such an injection, but were injected anyway, likely due to a false belief that the injection would save them from C19.

---

Comments:

• 2021; #17541; 97yo Female - Aortic stenosis for years. Congestive heart failure and pulmonary hypertension for only five weeks. Few challenge a 97yo woman’s death certificate. Pulmonary hypertension is a known side effect of the C19 injection. It is criminal that no one is screened out from this injectable product. C19 injection was listed in the narrative fields, but not listed in ICD-10 codes. Dr. Sheryl Derderian of West Springfield deserves a letter notifying her of her criminal liability for omission of Y590 and T881 from the ICD-10 codes and offering her the opportunity to remedy by amending the death certificate.

• 2021; #20283; 59yo Female - Valvular heart disease for years. Also not screened out. Died 2 days after C19 injection, from cardiac arrhythmia, a known side effect of the C19 injection. Dr. Nada Kerouz deserves a letter notifying her of her omission of Y590 and T881 codes. She has the opportunity to amend the death certificate to avoid criminal liability.

• 2021; #25261; 60yo Male - C19 injected. Died same day. Sudden cardiac arrhythmia 15 minutes before death. Cardiopulmonary arrest 5 minutes before death. Dr. Martin Gelman listed C19 injection as a cause in the narrative fields, but omitted Y590 and T881 codes. Dr. Gelman deserves a letter notifying him of criminal liability for the omission. Once notified, he has the opportunity to amend the death certificate and add Y590 and T881, else be criminally liable.

• 2021; #58635; 78yo Female - Died from covid pneumonia in days and could not get enough oxygen through her lungs. Her underlying causes are listed as COPD and hypertension. The doctor specifically wrote “unvaccinated for covid” in the narrative causes of death. If Dr. Madhura Manjunath of Boston went out of her way to write “unvaccinated” as an actual cause of death, the next question should be whether she ever wrote “vaccinated” on any others. Her name does not appear with any other “unvaccinated”. It seems rather odd that one would write “unvaccinated” as a cause of death. Death certificates are not VAERS reports or patient charts with notes.

• 2021; #60852; 76yo Female - 3-week C19 illness. Lost ability to take in oxygen and died. Co-morbidities: coronary artery disease, hypertension, and diabetes. Covid death of a woman in poor general health. Serious underlying conditions. Dr. Fnu Umair did go out of his or her way to write “unvaccinated” and it is the only time he or she has done so in the entire database of death certificates.

Two more non-elderly people, 59yo and 60yo, died soon after the C19 injection from seemingly common injection adverse effects and another very elderly person with co-morbidities was given the injection and then died weeks later.

Interestingly, very late in 2021 some doctors began writing “unvaccinated” on the death certificates, but did not write “vaccinated” on any death certificates. Speculation invokes belief that the act may betray the intent to deceive. Omission of “vaccinated” on all others may show a pattern of a great ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated dying. Below is an example of another death recorded by Dr. Manjunath. She did not mention the vaccination status of this woman.

At 69yo, this woman died of shock, cardiac arrest, decompensated heart failure, A-Fib, and gastrointestinal bleeding. She also had chronic kidney disease. Gastrointestinal bleeding rose significantly (19% to 20%) in the C19 year of 2020 and was elevated (7% to 10%) in the C19 injection year of 2021. Why did Dr. Manjunath not go out of her way to write the vaccination status of this woman on the death certificate? She did not die from C19. It seems that the likelihood of her being C19 injected would be very high. The question that remains is the temporal proximity between injection and death.

---

Comments:

• 2021; #61868; 67yo Male - Died from lack of oxygen and abnormal blood Ph as a result of covid pneumonia over days. He also had hypertension, diabetes, COPD and was not C19 injected. Physician Assistant Lisa Rampone of Brockton certified ten deaths in 2021 and only wrote “no prior covid vaccination” on this one. This record is second to last and date of death is 12/23/2021. The ages of the ten range from 55yo to 85yo and occurred April through December, a time in which most of Massachusetts had already been given C19 injections both doses and many had received Dose 3 (aka “booster”) in August and thereafter. Curiosity compels the question of why no mention of the other nine’s C19 injection status.

• 2022; #494; 78yo Female - Died from C19 pneumonia. Many underlying health concerns such as obesity and diabetes. Many other vascular and heart disease issues that put her at risk from both C19 and the C19 injection. Dr. Zachary Lipkin-Moore noted that the decedent was “unvaccinated.” Why? (More on Dr. Lipken-Moore below)

• 2022; #552; 74yo Male - Died from C19 pneumonia. Many underlying conditions. Dr. Zachary Lipkin-Moore again noted that decedent was “unvaccinated.” Why?

• 2022; #708; 52yo Male - Died from heart attack. Hypercoagulability (clots coming many and fast). C19 also causes clots, but at a rate far lower than the c19 injection. Patient was also morbidly obesity. Dr. Joe Joseph noted decedent as “not vaccinated for covid.” Why?

• 2022; #801; 72yo Male - Seems to have died from C19 pneumonia. Heart stopped due to low oxygen level. Noted as “unvaccinated.” Why?

Dr. Lipkin-Moore has certified fourteen deaths thus far in 2022. Two are listed above as “unvaccinated.” Are the other twelve C19 injected? If so, why did Dr. Lipkin-Moore not mention that they were C19 injected? Do any of those twelve present with symptoms that are common to the C19 injection? Here is one to review:

This record may be so recent that Dr. Lipkin-Moore has not entered the ICD-10 codes yet. Considering there is mention of pulmonary hypertension, acute deep vein thrombosis in BOTH legs, acute pulmonary emboli, heart valve back-flow, and died from “acute on chronic”(?) systolic heart failure, Dr. Lipkin-Moore deserves a notice of criminal liability that omission of Y590 and T881 codes constitute fraud. Clots in both legs, past his heart, to his lungs indicates a likelihood this woman was C19 injected and died soon after. Booster anyone?

---

Comments:

• 2022; #5076; 94yo Female - Expired due to C19 pneumonia, heart stopped. Dr. Hong Gao noted that she was “unvaccinated.” Why?

• 2022; #5225; 68yo Female - Died from respiratory distress due to bacterial pneumonia. She could not get enough oxygen to survive. Underlying conditions of diabetes and emphysema. C19 was listed as a cause. Dr. Joeli Roth noted that patient was “unvaccinated against COVID-19.” Why? Death certificates are for causes of death, not patient charts and conjecture. Dr. Roth certified no other deaths in 2021 or 2022. Dr. Roth and other doctors who write “unvaccinated” deserve later to be put under oath and asked why they write “unvaccinated” and never have written “vaccinated” for those who died.

• 2022; #6554; 10 Male - Born premature at 23 weeks, patient lived 10 years with cerebral palsy and several health issues. Dr. Andrew Elin noted that this boy was C19 injected, but also tested positive for C19. This record was coded as R99, which is a holding bin for inconclusive findings. The truth should be known, thus, Dr. Elin deserves a letter to remind him to include Y590 and T881 as causes.

• 2022; #8089; 87yo Male - died of low blood pressure, respiratory distress, and was noted by Dr. Joe Joseph to be “unvaccinated.” Dr. Joseph certified six death certificates in 2022 and only one in 2021. Two of them were noted as “unvaccinated.” Why did he not note that the others were C19 injected, if they were?

• 2022; #14456; 85yo Male - Guillain-Barre Syndrome occurred after C19 injection and for five months. Cerebrovascular dementia occurred for the past five months. Patient then died. Dr. Charles Rosenbaum deserves a letter notifying him of a crime of omission for not including Y590 and T881 ICD-10 codes. He mentioned the injection in the narrative fields and is obligated to include it in the codes. He can avoid criminal liability by amending the death certificate to reflect the truth.

To summarize The “vaccin” Search section, there are ten mentions of “vaccinated” and ten mentions of “unvaccinated.” Considering there are nearly 80,000 deaths in 2021 and 2022 thus far in Massachusetts, these numbers are very low. One reason for this extremely low number is the topic of the next section.

---

Why do doctors not use “vaccine” codes in death certificates?

One issue especially nags the reasonable mind wishing to avoid conspiracy theories. But first, Common Law Conspiracy is when two or more people agree to commit an unlawful act, have a specific intent to complete the objective act, and at least one of the conspirators commits an overt act or substantial step in furtherance of the objective unlawful act.

It is one thing to say that a few doctors refused to write “vaccine” or use codes Y590 and T881 for a few deaths. It seems a next level of credulity to imagine that the entire medical industry purposely avoids the use of Y590 and T881 and that they are covering up for the C19 injection as a possible cause of causes of a large number of deaths.

Remembering Aquinas’s opinion that oligarchies descend into tyranny quite easily, the question to ask is - how could nearly all the doctors be coerced into omitting C19 injectable biological products as an underlying cause of death? “Rare” has no meaning without context, especially where human life is concerned and even more so where children’s lives are concerned. Adding context, it is understandable that doctors, who never encounter a C19 injection death, continue to subscribe to the CDC and medical boards recommendations. Id est, these majority doctors may actually believe the products are “safe and effective.” If a doctor has 100 patients, then perhaps he has only a one in ten chance of encountering a C19 injection death. And in the chance encounter of a C19 injection death, the odds of an average doctor recognizing the causation are low and depend on temporal proximity between injection and death. This is not to diminish the greater frequency of injury without death from the C19 injections. This cursory exercise in determining odds is merely an attempt to be overly conservative in assigning blame for ignorance. Willful ignorance is a different discussion left for another time.

For the many doctors, who do encounter C19 biological product deaths, the nagging question still remains - why do they not speak up and report the cause on death certificates? Surely, they adhere to their oaths and if the deaths were so obviously linked to the C19 injection, they would speak up. The troubling answer lies in the plans of the oligarchs.

Here is a joint statement from the CEO’s of three national medical boards to all physicians in USA. This is more than coercion. This rises to a number of federal felony crimes and is posted in plain sight on their websites. This coercive and solicitous joint statement crime, rooted in conspiracy, racketeering, fraud, interference in commerce, and conspiracy against rights, had a powerful impact on all physicians in the United States as told to this author by physicians.

Joint Statement from the American Board of Family Medicine, American Board of Internal Medicine, and American Board of Pediatrics on Dissemination of Misinformation by Board Certified Physicians about COVID-19

Submitted on Thu, 09/09/2021 - 11:56

The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), which supports its member state medical licensing boards, has recently issued a statement saying that providing misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine contradicts physicians’ ethical and professional responsibilities, and therefore may subject a physician to disciplinary actions, including suspension or revocation of their medical license. We at the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), and the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) support FSMB’s position. We also want all physicians certified by our Boards to know that such unethical or unprofessional conduct may prompt their respective Board to take action that could put their certification at risk.

Expertise matters, and board-certified physicians have demonstrated that they have stayed current in their field. Spreading misinformation or falsehoods to the public during a time of a public health emergency goes against everything our Boards and our community of board-certified physicians stand for. The evidence that we have safe, effective and widely available vaccines against COVID-19 is overwhelming. We are particularly concerned about physicians who use their authority to denigrate vaccination at a time when vaccines continue to demonstrate excellent effectiveness against severe illness, hospitalization and death.

We all look to board-certified physicians to provide outstanding care and guidance; providing misinformation about a lethal disease is unethical, unprofessional and dangerous. In times of medical emergency, the community of expert physicians committed to science and evidence collectively shares a responsibility for giving the public the most accurate and timely health information available, so they can make decisions that work best for themselves and their families.

Warren Newton, MD, MPH

President and CEO

American Board of Family Medicine

Richard J. Baron, MD

President and CEO

American Board of Internal Medicine

David G. Nichols, MD, MBA

President and CEO

American Board of Pediatrics”

This joint statement can be found here.

The original text from the FSMB (Federation of State Medical Licensing Boards) can be found here.

Doctors have told this author that they do not dare mention the C19 injectable product as a possible cause of death or adverse event, else they will lose their licenses to practice. Without a license to practice medicine, what can a doctor do to earn a living for himself or herself and family and make his way through the world after investing most of his or her life learning to heal and prevent illness.

The language in the publication is criminal solicitation of fraud. Common Law Solicitation requires that the actor affirmatively intend to have another commit a crime and that the actor encourage or convince another in some way to commit a crime.

Solicitation has a low burden of proof for the prosecution. All that is required is that a jury believe that the CEO’s of these three medical boards intended that doctors omit “vaccine” as a cause of injury or death whenever they encounter such an occurrence. The omission is a misrepresentation and meets the other fraud elements. Thus, the CEO’s can be shown to have intended it and they performed the act of publicly sending this extremely chilling joint statement out to all US physicians. The intent and act are complete. The crime of solicitation is proven. If the underlying crime of fraud happens to be a felony and a subsequent death results from the act of omission in not including “vaccine” or Y590 and T881 were a cause, then this is felony murder. If the fraud is a misdemeanor, then it would rise to involuntary manslaughter.

Example:

Given:

1. a 7yo girl dies from the C19 injection in Groton, MA,

2. doctors omitted Y590 and T881 on her death certificate, thus committing fraud,

3. those doctors had scienter of the injection as the cause,

4. those doctors did intend to omit mention of the injection as a cause,

5. a 15yo boy dies 3 weeks later and 20 miles away on a basketball court in Andover, MA from the C19 injection.

The legal argument is that the 15yo boy would not have died but for the knowing omission of Y590 and T881 from the 8yo’s death certificate. The 15yo boy died during the commission of federal felonies 18 USC § 1035 “False statements relating to healthcare matters” et al. The unlawful act of solicitation of this felony murder is attributed to these CEO’s. At Common Law there also can be applied Depraved Heart Murder, Conspiracy, et al. The joint statement has three names right there on the bottom.

---

Conspiracy is a crime, not a cliché

In reviewing ABIM board of directors, there seem to be many assistant professors and professors at medical schools. The web site shows a statement on “Systemic Racism and Health Disparities”. And the executive staff is comprised of 10 white men, 2 white women, and one Asian man. Race should not matter, but when an organization presents itself as woke and whose board comprises mostly university professors, one might expect some diversity on the executive staff, especially in a profession such as medicine where there are many non-white men. Irony leaps.

The criminal issues do not all revolve around fraud on these death certificates. The FSMB does not seem to be funded by the government. They may be. It is difficult to find any information on them. How can this agency have any power over state government medical licensing boards? How can ABIM and other private organizations have any power over licensing of physicians to the extent of threatening licensure revocation? This schema screams for investigation.

These boards and societies inserted themselves between the physician and patient. Though they purport to be watchdogs over physicians for the benefit of the public, a grand jury investigation would likely and easily find evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that these boards and societies are co-conspirators with oligarchs for benefit of the industry and to the detriment of The People. Therefore, in coming between the patient and physician as they have done constitutes a deprivation of rights of the patients to receive objective care and of the physicians in pursuit of the commerce of their profession and in treating the patients objectively as contracted for by the patients.

Here are some United States Code (USC) statutes one can envision a grand jury investigating:

• 18 USC § 241 Conspiracy against rights

• 18 USC § 242 Deprivation of rights

• 18 USC § 1035 False statements relating to health care matters

• 18 USC § 1040 Fraud in connection with major disaster or emergency benefits

• 18 USC § 1951 Interference with commerce by threats or violence

• 18 USC Chapter 96 Racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations (RICO)

• 18 USC § 1111 Murder (2nd degree)

• 18 USC § 1112 Manslaughter (Involuntary)

This is where the oligarchs enter the investigation. Conspirators recruit (solicit) conspirators. Oligarchs, as conspirators, donate $Millions in grant money to universities for medical and pharmaceutical research. They pay for the results they want. The university professors sit on the medical boards as noted in the ABIM example above. Professors’ income is tied to these grants. To make it easy, here is one simple example. Medical boards and societies work hand in hand and share board members, who bring in philanthropic speakers, who dole out tens of millions or hundreds of millions of dollars in grant money. Policy and recommendations are bought when needed.

IHME is almost completely funded by Bill Gates. One can envision that IHME will say whatever Gates wants them to say. IHME’s statements that masks work was among three authorities used by state attorneys general to defend against lawsuits for injunction around the United States. The other two, used by the states’ attorneys general against the citizens, that rose to the level of authority of IHME, are the CDC and the WHO. IHME is in good company. Remember that IHME and Bill Gates are indistinguishable from each other in what is recommended.

To lighten up this most serious topic of children and adults losing their lives to the C19 injection, here posted is the Senior Management Team of IHME. It seems that the Chief Diversity Officer is doing a poor job. Perhaps that is why his picture circle is smaller than all others and is poor in quality. Or perhaps he was not onsite at IHME on picture day … or ever? Remember that this is an organization funded $279 Million by Bill Gates and on par in authority with CDC and WHO, at least according the state attorneys general in USA. How can this organization be so blatantly hypocritical? Did they bother to look at their own Senior Management Team in context of “Racism is a public health issue”? [you may laugh out loud at them here]

---

Masking was always a coercion to inject C19 biological products

Gate’s influence pervades all matters of C19, each tying back to the C19 injectable biological product. It was very important to keep society masked until the C19 injections were released. The injection became the key to removing the masks. It was so stated by Gates, Fauci, government officials, and medical boards.

Gates’ IHME was instrumental in ensuring people stayed masked. IHME’s influence can be seen in the state of Massachusetts’ Motions to Dismiss in Bechade v Baker, No. CV 20-11122 (D. Mass. Sept. 23, 2020), Beaudoin v Baker, No. CV-11187 (D. Mass. Mar. 25, 2021), and most cases involving C19 executive orders from Governor Baker.

In Bechade, Massachusetts Assistant Attorney General Michael Lafleur wrote in Baker’s Motion to Dismiss:

Projections by the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation forecast a reduction in 33,000 deaths from COVID-19 in the United States by October 1 if 95% of people were to wear masks in public. Lafleur Aff. Ex. H. The Institute’s Director put these stark figures in context, stating: “People need to know that wearing masks can reduce transmission of the virus by as much as 50 percent, and those who refuse are putting their lives, their families, their friends, and their communities at risk.” Lafleur Aff. Ex. H.

Anyone understanding engineering, physics, or even biology knows that the testimony offered by IHME in the Motions to Dismiss is absolute dung. There is no science behind any of those numbers. It is merely an opinion, paid for by an oligarch, and meant to coerce people into getting injected. Judges all over USA were taken for fools by these prevarications and neither the state nor IHME were sanctioned or scolded in any way.

Masking ended for general society in the spring of 2021 in most locations after C19 injections had shipped and were in the arms of a large majority of society. The injections were not approved for children 5 to 11yo until November 2021, however. This is why school districts frantically ordered masking in August of 2021 in order to force children to mask until they received the C19 injection. This time the order was for children. Earlier it was earlier for all society. Masks were never intended to stop the spread of C19 disease, but rather only as a coercive method to ensure children wanted to receive a C19 injection.

Staying with Massachusetts as an example, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) issued the order to mask children in August 2021 and reinforced it a few times. Proving the reason to mask was not to stop spread, but rather to coerce C19 injection, here is a link to the order/letter from DESE, which includes this quote around paragraph 6 of page 1:

“Currently, if a school building demonstrates a vaccination rate of 80 percent or more of all students and staff in the school through an attestation form submitted to DESE, then vaccinated individuals in that school would no longer be subject to the state mask requirement.”

Clearly, this order has nothing to do with stopping spread as it was known then that C19 injections do not stop spread. The overt statement tying injection percentage to mask removal betrays the true intent of a needle in every arm.

Turning back to medical boards and societies, how would oligarchs control the boards to coerce the doctors? Why would they coerce the doctors, especially in violation of federal and state statutory law and Common Law? Not to pick on Bill Gates, but he keeps showing up in simple searches.

Bill Gates delivered remarks at the Shattuck Lecture. Here is an excerpt.

From GatesNotes - The Blog of Bill Gates, April 27, 2018

The next epidemic is coming. Here’s how we can make sure we’re ready.

To broaden efforts even further, today we are launching a $12 million Grand Challenge in partnership with the Page family to accelerate the development of a universal flu vaccine.

This lecture given by Gates in April 2018 occurred in Boston, MA, a large industrial center for pharmaceutical research, finance, and various company headquarters. Bill Gates was introduced to give that speech by Dr. Jeffrey Drazen, a 1972 MD graduate of Harvard Medical School. Dr. Drazen is a former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, which is owned by the Massachusetts Medical Society. Dr. Drazen also held professorships at Harvard graduate schools including the T.H. Chan School of Public Health. His specialty in research is pulmonology.

Summarized simply, this article contains enough evidence of real deaths resulting from the C19 injection and real conspiratorial connections to boards, societies, and oligarchs and calls out real federal crimes and elements to a standard far beyond the reasonable suspicion standard necessary for a grand jury to begin investigation, issue subpoenas for evidence and witnesses, hear testimony, and determine probable cause for indictment.

---

Every single record containing prevarication is a count in a criminal complaint

Deaths certificate narrative fields are “Immediate cause of death”, “Intermediate/Underlying Causes”, and “Other significant conditions contributing to death.” If a person died from “acute fentanyl intoxication”, then C19 does not fit into any of these categories. It simply was not a cause of death nor did it contribute to a cause of death.

Example:

A person is having a bad month. His wife asks for divorce. His son becomes paralyzed. He loses his career due to malpractice. Yet he tries to hold it together emotionally. He is fine. Then, he gets into an automobile accident and breaks his leg. That is the straw that broke the camel’s back and he takes out a 9mm, puts it to his head and pulls the trigger.

The autopsy may include that he had a fractured tibia. Other reports may mention the broken leg. But if the medical examiner, or other death certificate certifier wrote “fractured tibia” anywhere under causes of death on the death certificate, then that is a misrepresentation. If it was added for the insurance company to pay off on the death, then that misrepresentation is fraud. Even if it was the “but for” cause, as lawyers say, it still is not a cause of death medically.

The 2020 database, as shown in C19 “vaccine” - the cause of causes, shows that many drug overdoses were listed as C19 deaths. Each one is a count of fraud and other various federal and state crimes.

The next step in the records search is to look in the concatenated ICD-10 code column MD for both “U071” (COVID-19) and “X4” (Accidental poisoning by and exposure to noxious substances). Both must occur. In 2022, the following two records appeared.

Dr. Robert Welton listed them both as “SARS-COV-2 POSITIVE”. Though this may be true, by the causes of death and the ages of the victims, in neither was the virus a cause of death. Despite what Dr. Welton may have been told by his superiors, he is in violation of federal felony criminal codes. If the hospital administration or other entity for which he works coerced him into writing this, then they, too, are in violation of criminal codes. Dr. Welton very much deserves notice of criminal liability for federal felonies.

Here are but a few federal statutes likely violated and upon which a grand jury should investigate and then indict:

• 18 USC § 220 Illegal remunerations for referrals to recovery homes, clinical treatment facilities, and laboratories

• 18 USC § 225 Continuing financial crimes enterprise

• 18 USC § 286 Conspiracy to defraud the government with respect to claims

• 18 USC § 287 False fictitious or fraudulent claims

• 18 USC § 371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

• 18 USC § 1002 Possession of false papers to defraud United States

• 18 USC § 1035 False statements relating to health care matters

• 18 USC § 1040 Fraud in connection with major disaster or emergency benefits

• 18 USC Chapter 96 Racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations (RICO)

It is widely known that the government offered several incentives regarding C19. The federal government called it “relief” in the Cares Act to an initial total of $2.2 TRILLION. One idea was extra money to care providers for each C19-labeled death. Another idea was extra money for ever death on a ventilator. Another bill passed into law provided funeral expenses to anyone who died with a C19-label. These were all incentives to defraud the American people of trillions of dollars in expenses. How is it equitable to give one person $9,000 in funeral expenses for their 95yo mother’s funeral where she has assets of $5million, but give nothing to a struggling family who lost a child to leukemia and whose parents are unemployed because they were with their son during his last weeks alive? These programs are not “caring” not “necessary” not “equitable”. They are ridiculous and will bankrupt that nation on purpose right under the noses of the citizenry.

Before looking for all the 2020 and 2021 combinations of U071 and X4, Dr. Welton is here scrutinized, specifically.

This is the only one record that has both U071 and X4 under Dr. Welton’s license number. This is clearly another fraudulent death certificate. This should also be referenced when sending Dr. Welton a notice of criminal liability for federal felonies. Dr. Welton only claimed nine C19 deaths in 2021. A few others also look suspect. 2020 must now also be searched.

Dr. Welton certified eleven U071 C19 deaths and 485 total deaths in 2020. He certified nine U071 C19 deaths and 477 total deaths in 2021. Below are five suspect C19 deaths. If a person 62yo dies of a fentanyl overdose and has cardiovascular disease, how does one in good conscience attribute such death to C19, especially when there was not even a positive test given?

At this time, it is important to note that Dr. Welton should not receive any directed ire or special treatment. This is simply an exercise in investigative data searches. It is likely there are others who attributed far more drug overdose deaths to C19 and it is likely that Dr. Welton was ordered or coerced to write U071 as a cause of death.

When a grand jury subpoenas witnesses to testify, they often overlook transgressions such as what these doctors have done in order to identify the solicitors and co-conspirators who initiated the criminal enterprise. Hospital administrators, medical board CEO’s, politicians, and pharmaceutical company lobbyists should be the real targets of the investigation.

In addition to the overdoses, the last two appear very suspect as well. Given that Dr. Welton has only certified twenty-three U071 deaths across all three years 2020-2022, he deserves a letter of notice to review all of them and amend them as required by law. Dr. Welton has work to do to remedy unlawful acts, else be liability for federal felonies.

---

Anecdoting

An acquaintance from Massachusetts knew of this author’s work and offered an anecdote. The acquaintance said he knows a man who did not want the C19 injection, but his employer required it and was going to sack him if he did not get it. The acquaintance said the man relented and received the injection and was found in bed the next morning having expired within 24 hours of the injection. The acquaintance mentioned the name, age, place of residence, employer, job title, and date of death. He asked me to look up the death certificate.

The man’s death certificate lists only “COVID-19” as a cause of death and only “Obesity” in the “Other significant conditions contributing to death”. There was no mention of C19 pneumonia. There was no mention of heart, brain, clotting, bleeding, lung, or any other issue related to this 48yo man. There were only two ICD-10 codes listed: U071 for “COVID-19” and E669 for “Obesity, unspecified”.

Note that it does not say “Morbid obesity”. In general, 36% of Americans are obese. The term should not attribute any cause for a 48yo middle-age man.

Here is the death record.

“UNKNOWN” means that Dr. Grivetti decided it was unknown how long the decedent had C19. Given the accuracy of information given by the acquaintance (Name, age, town of residence, date of death, industry worked in, and job function), the statement about the decedent being C19 injected the day before death is taken as true and would be taken as true to establish reasonable suspicion for a grand jury investigation. Dr. Janice Grivetti deserves a strongly worded letter giving her notice of criminal liability for several federal felonies. Her other death certificates are worth looking into.

As seen in the table above, it seems that Dr. Grivetti is a serial fraudster. Dr. Grivetti certified 451 deaths in 2021, only seven of which were listed as U071 C19. The only one, which appears to have had “COVID PNEUMONIA,” was listed as “RECENT”, which means she was recovered. The patient was also listed with a pulmonary embolism and the immediate cause of death was listed as cardiopulmonary arrest. This seems more like a C19 injection death than a C19 disease death. Nonetheless, she’d recovered from C19 and then died from a PE.

To summarize the seven: one blunt force trauma death, one chronic substance abuse, one cardiovascular disease and alcoholism, one with nothing but U071 alone (very odd), one C19 pneumonia recovered but really died from an I269 PE, one C19 death in the presence of high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease, and, lastly, one C19 death in the presence of obesity not classified as morbid (but an acquaintance said he took the C19 injection the prior day).

The Massachusetts citizenry and the rest of the US citizenry and (why stop there) the world should be furious about this systemic mass fraud coerced by unelected oligarchs and medical boards. Massachusetts is a world center of pharmaceutical research and corporate offices. The investigation should begin in Massachusetts. This massive fraud was in plain sight. Someone just needed to start digging in.

It is time to review Dr. Grivetti’s work in 2020. Oh no. It’s even worse in 2020. It seems Dr. Grivetti simply does not want to do her job filling out death certificates with real causes of death or that she’s somehow coerced into listing some as C19 deaths. Is there a quota for each medical examiner? Perhaps she does not want to do this and does a poor job covering up on purpose. Below are the tables of 2020 death certificates.

This is becoming repetitive. Again you see that Dr. Grivetti has listed U071 C19 for deaths that appear to have died from something entirely different such as opioid overdose or some unlisted thing. U071 should never be an immediate cause of death. Dr. Grivetti certified 327 deaths in 2020, only ten of which were listed as U071 C19. The ten are split between two tables of five, one above and one below.

Again, Dr. Janice Grivetti deserves multiple letters notifying her of multiple counts of multiple federal felonies.

Clearly, C19 never was as bad as the public was led to believe.

---

Return to Groton

As a follow-up to the Tragedy in Groton, Massachusetts article, here is the newly acquired 2022 death record of the 7yo girl who lost her life in Groton, Massachusetts on January 18, 2022.

Given the age, this deserves attention again. ICD-10 Codes: U071 = C19, B49 = “unspecified mycosis” (“Mycosis” is defined as an infection or disease caused by a fungus.), J450 = “predominantly allergic asthma”, R091 = “pleurisy”.

There is nothing in this death certificate that explains the death of a healthy 7yo girl. The “Immediate” cause (CODIA) is listed as “Complications of Coronavirus-19 Viral Infection”. That is not an immediate cause. Did her heart stop? Was her heart deprived of oxygen? Was her brain deprived of oxygen? Again, none of these causes explain why a 7yo girl died. If her lungs were so bad from pleurisy and asthma that she could not breath, the immediate cause would be cardiopulmonary arrest, cardiac arrest, acute hypoxemia or something similar.

Dr. Michele Matthews deserves a letter warning of federal felonies if this death certificate is not amended.

Another look at a particular VAERS record is worth placing here on the same page.

When writing the letter to Dr. Matthews, notify her of this VAERS record. If the death certificate and the VAERS record are the same 7yo girl, then this is a cover-up of immense proportion in which the medical community, the school district, the government, and all local media conspired to misinform the public, which only caused more deaths from the C19 injections. Such an omission of the C19 injection as a cause of death would be a federal felony leading to the felony murder of a 15yo boy weeks later a few towns away. He collapsed on a basketball court and later died. That is, it is felony murder if it is determined that the 15yo died from the C19 injection.

---

Closing Notes

Interestingly, using the MODE( ) function on the CERT_LIC_NUM (certifier’s license number) to determine who certified the most death certificates in Massachusetts in 2021 yielded the name “Dr. Rebecca Dedrick”. She certified 575 deaths in 2021. She is also the only one to use Y590 and T881 codes for a clear case of C19 injection death by thrombocytopenia.

This article is likely reaching its expiration time in the attention of readers. There are too many paths to take when researching individual records.

One last quick exercise of looking at Dr. Dedrick’s certifications yielded a rather benign looking record among all the fentanyl deaths (idea for another article). Here is a death certificate of a 48yo man.

His obituary was easy to find because he was loved so much by his family. There are many things obvious from the obituary. He has a 14yo daughter with whom he spent time and for whom he cared deeply. The obituary stated that it was good that he was able to attend a wedding recently back where he was raised. He got to see extended family and it was the first time in 18 months he was able to see his parents due to the pandemic (that really only lasted about 8 weeks in 2020 in Massachusetts). Among all the love and family depicted in the obituary, there is one line that stood out.

Tragically Daniel died very suddenly on April 20, from no discernible cause.

The family may never know why this father, son, brother, and friend lost his life 32 years earlier than life expectancy. The data is clear on the C19 biological injection. It’s a lottery. When you win, you lose … your life. God bless him and his family.

---

Conclusion

Much more could have been done in this article to provide data, which is what scientists seem to want. That is their type of proof, their type of evidence.

These individual records are the evidence of pedestrian people. The work put into research of data, research in individual records of fraud, research in law applied to conspiracy, and crafting letters of notice to bad actors has all been done for you. This is not just for Massachusetts. These are federal laws. People of the United States, take back your nation. Be leaders once again and put an end to this oligarchical tyranny.

These criminal acts performed at a globally known center of the pharmaceutical industry, medical technology, research medical schools and universities, and hospital care centers in Massachusetts have had an effect on the world. There is a reason Massachusetts was 3rd in the world in C19 deaths per million for most of the first year of C19.

Here is an example nation/state tracker one person put together every month until mid-2021. Massachusetts is the cyan color across the top.

Please engage in sending the notices of felonious acts. It does not matter where in the world or the United States you are from. These death certificates need to be amended to reflect the truth. People have turned a blind eye to VAERS. But these are real death certificates. If they are honestly amended, then the signal will be clear and the C19 injections will stop.

What is more important than saving the lives of children? People post on social media, complain in chat groups, attend meetings, donate to political campaigns, and engage in other activities that take time. Please consider taking a few minutes of time to send one or more of these letters.

To reflect on the beginning, you have learned in this article:

• Fraud committed in labeling overdoses and blunt force trauma as “C19” deaths,

• Fraud in omitting Y590 and T881 injection causes of death codes, while mentioning recent C19 injections in narrative fields,

• Many seemingly obvious C19 biological injection death certificates omitting mention of the C19 injection as a cause,

• Coercion and solicitation of fraud from ABIM, ABFP, ABP medical boards, and

• Conspiracy by Gates Foundation, IHME, and med boards including mention of NEJM and MMS.

Though thrombocytopenia alone is enough to shut down the C19 injection program worldwide, do not miss the bigger picture. The entire circulatory system is under attack by the C19 injections. Aggregated circulatory system causes-of-death in 2021 show catastrophic casualties masked by the fraud in the reporting system. C19 injection deaths are being reported as C19 deaths or heart attacks or R99 codes as proven in the death certificates of Massachusetts. This is double-dipping in fraud.

It is now proven that fraud happened, is happening, and will continue to happen unless you call it out and demand transparency and grand jury investigations. This article demonstrated the process of fraud including who, when, how, and why.

Thank you for hanging in there are reading this far.

---

There seems no way to attach a Word document. Below are TWO letters you can copy/paste to a word processor. In Letter 1, add your name and send to the medical examiners’ names and addresses in the tables above. In Letter 2, simply add your name and send to the three addresses in the letter.

Thank you for whatever you do toward saving people from these deadly biological product injections. Evil will be defeated by “the Way and the Truth and the Life.” John 14:6

God Bless you all.

---

Letter 1

<NAME>

<Street Address>

<City, ST zipcode>

<Telephone Number>

<email address>

Date xx, 2022

<Certifier Medical Examiner’s Title and Name>

<Certifier Medical Examiner’s street address>

<Certifier ME’s City, State Zip Code>

Dear Dr. <name>:

A Massachusetts watchdog group reviewed the death certificate database and quickly identified hundreds of felonious acts by certifiers/medical examiners. At least one of the death certificates you attested to by signature is among the likely fraudulent death certificates.

This letter is legal notice of mistake, error, or purposeful act, the latter of which would be a federal felony. You have the opportunity to review and amend your work in death certificates.

I strongly suggest you seek advice from your personal attorney and do not rely upon your employer, insurer, peers or government official or their counsel for advice. None of the aforementioned have your interest in mind. They seek to protect themselves and the system of corruption that may soon or within the next five years be investigated by federal grand juries nationwide.

Grand juries comprise citizens who have the power to subpoena witnesses and documents in the investigation of crimes. On substack.com you will find an author named “Coquin de Chien.” Look for the article entitled “Scienter, not science”. You will find your attested to death certificate SFN Numbers that you may well want to amend. Also, you will find some applicable federal felonies.

If you were instructed to omit Y590 and T881 or the “Covid vaccines” as causes, or if you were instructed to add U071 covid when the death did not result from covid as a cause, then you should save original communication and provide copies to your attorney. It may be important in your defense and for plea bargaining. District Attorneys and US Attorneys prefer to prosecute the solicitors and lead co-conspirators rather than those at the bottom of a conspiracy.

The People demand justice for the massive fraud that led to so many deaths, overdoses, suicides, and injuries. Taxpayers were robbed of $Trillions to fill the coffers of big Pharma et al.

Regards,

<Name>

---

Letter 2

<NAME

<Street Address>

<City, ST zipcode>

<Telephone Number>

<email address>

Date xx, 2022

Warren Newton, CEO

The American Board of Family Medicine

1648 McGrathiana Parkway Suite 550

Lexington, KY 40511-1247

Richard Baron, CEO

American Board of Internal Medicine

510 Walnut Street, Suite 1700

Philadelphia, PA 19106

David Nichols, CEO

The American Board of Pediatrics

111 Silver Cedar Court

Chapel Hill, SC 27514

Dear Dr.s Newton, Baron, and Nichols:

This is notice of federal felony crimes of which you may or may not be aware, and for which you have criminal liability notwithstanding ignorance of fact or law.

On substack.com you will find an author named “Coquin de Chien.” Under that author you will find an article entitled, “Scienter, not science.” In that article are the federal felonies and evidence of your participation in inchoate crimes leading to those felonies. Inchoate crimes include solicitation, conspiracy, and attempt, although some merge with crimes of fraud, deprivation of rights, false statements, racketeering, RICO, murder, and other crimes associated with your acts.

Your criminal act of solicitation was complete when you issued a chilling joint statement regarding vaccine misinformation to all doctors. While this may seem benign to you, your intent is for a jury to decide. Doctors will testify that they were afraid to blame the vaccine for injuries and deaths and, thus, forwent doing so based on your solicitation. As a result of the crimes of omission resulting in fraud, more deaths occurred. As fraud on a government claim rises to a felony and further deaths resulted from those omissions, felony murder is provable.

If you think that the government will not likely pursue charges, you are only correct in time and purview. When a new administration installs an honest Department of Justice or if The People demand a grand jury investigation, you will have cause for worry. There is no statute of limitations on felony murder. I recommend you seek the advice of counsel as soon as possible to review what you have done. You may have an opportunity to rescind your joint statement and make a public retraction allowing doctors the freedom to act according to their expert opinions in collaboration with their patients’ informed consent.

You have neither the right, duty, nor authority to insert yourselves between the public and their medical practitioners’ opinions. You are not a governing body. You do not have administrative authority granted by the Constitution. FSMB is not an authorized entity. You must rescind your statement and you must publicly retract your public statement and include an admission that you lack authority. Cease your coercion of physicians. They must be free to offer their opinions to patients.

Please take this matter very seriously. There are now hundreds of thousands, likely millions of people gathering behind this initiative to restore medicine to a private partnership between patient and practitioner.

Here are some of the United States Code (USC) statutes recommended in a grand jury investigation along with solicitation and conspiracy:

• 18 USC § 241 Conspiracy against rights

• 18 USC § 242 Deprivation of rights

• 18 USC § 1035 False statements relating to health care matters

• 18 USC § 1040 Fraud in connection with major disaster or emergency benefits

• 18 USC § 1951 Interference with commerce by threats or violence

• 18 USC Chapter 96 Racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations (RICO)

• 18 USC § 1111 Murder (2nd degree)

• 18 USC § 1112 Manslaughter (Involuntary)

There are some who pledge the rest of their lives to pursue the co-conspirators in this covid matter. They are relentless, intelligent, and equipped with virtue, truth, and honor. You would be wise to evaluate your standing in this matter and make public amends for the intentional conduct to coerce physicians. Your conduct caused loss of life and livelihood. Truth will come forward.

Regards,

<Name>