Hi John, my friend Chris Edwards in UK just sent me UK data showing massive increase in Cataract over a similar timescale to yours. I wonder if any of your Death certificates describe sudden onset blindness?
I hadn't heard of cataracts from the vax. But I've known about retinal detachments since November 2021 I think it was, when my brother-in-law told me about a conversation with his ophthalmologist and then I talked to Byram Bridle about doing study with another researcher at his university. We never did it, but the signal is huge.
Anecdotally my 30 yr old niece and my 40 year old gardener both had pneumonia in the last 2 years. Both healthy young adults so this is very abnormal. Both double jabbed in the UK with Pfizer.
I've had my eye on pneumonia for years, but I shy away from it in podcasts. People don't understand more than raw numbers. When I get into combinations of codes and adjusting for all-cause excess, I lose most people. But it is in my book.
Specifically, from 2020 to 2021, in MA, all-cause excess was cut in half, covid was cut in half, pneumonia unspecified marginal difference from norm was cut in half, viral pneumonia marginal difference from norm was cut in half, AND BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA WENT UP
This breakdown of the data is really eye-opening! I've been trying to learn more about how data visualation choices can either reveal or hide patterns, and your fiscal year vs calendar year comparison nails this perfectly. Working in research myself, I've seen how even well-meaning standardized approaches can mask important singals. The summer excess pattern you identified is def something that deserves deeper investigation.
I used to give presentations to execs of multi-billion dollar companies and to engineers and other intelligent people who were difficult to trick. But I had my ways of manipulating graphs to achieve what I wanted.
"Diseases do not take out all the dry tinder (unhealthy and old) and then come back around to kill more of the healthy people in subsequent years than it killed of unhealthy people in the first year."
------------------
Great point. In more-than-a-century of epidemiologic records, this phenomenon has "never happened before" (even during the questionable 1918 pandemic). Respiratory diseases do not attack in continued, step-wise, incremental fashion like that.
Thanks for the update John. How much data must we see and investigate and how many different ways must we do this before what is totally obvious is admitted and something done about it? I wonder.
Al the evidence is in the lack of investigation by health agencies. They have the world fooled as to what epidemiology is. Most of the scientists and doctors on our side are in a cult of "evidence-based." They are playing by the broken rules of a rigged game with rigged data and rigged managers of the "peer review."
You may have already done this, but if not, it would be interesting to look at patterns of unattended deaths over time (ICD-10 codes R90.*), perhaps ratios of pneumonia deaths to unattended deaths by year/FY/ season etc. Rationale being, if the virus itself (vs hospital protocols) was SO deadly, you would have expected large increases of unattended deaths, people not able or willing to get to the hospital in time for life-saving measures when unable to breathe—especially during the pre-omicron era. If however such deaths stayed about the same, it provides more evidence that it was ventilators, sedatives and remdesivir that caused the deaths. As for post-omicron and during the vaccine era, you’d expect unattended deaths to surge. An interrupted time series would be a statistically and visually compelling way to explore these temporal inflection points.
Thinking about the seasonal flu pattern, it seems that the typical winter flu peak is due to human immune deficiency due to loss of winter sun and the impact of cold weather. It is not cause by changes to the virus which is probably present all year round.
Excess death in summer, when immunity should peak is very abnormal then.
Or ... when people retreat to confined areas and share each others' aerosols, then each is more susceptible given the minimum effective dose increase. Or something we aren't even considering. The issue is that they won't study anything.
Hi John, my friend Chris Edwards in UK just sent me UK data showing massive increase in Cataract over a similar timescale to yours. I wonder if any of your Death certificates describe sudden onset blindness?
I hadn't heard of cataracts from the vax. But I've known about retinal detachments since November 2021 I think it was, when my brother-in-law told me about a conversation with his ophthalmologist and then I talked to Byram Bridle about doing study with another researcher at his university. We never did it, but the signal is huge.
Wow. Really quick search turned up this, first time I’ve heard of it. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9259510/
Thanks very much indeed Jay.
John have you heard of Joachim Gerlach?
In this interview with Kevin McCairn, he discusses the uptick in pneumonia at 36.25 mins.
He also discusses immunodeficiency more broadly in the context of the covid vaccines/infections.
https://rumble.com/v746bja-evidence-for-widespread-immune-dysregulation-with-joachim-gerlach.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
Anecdotally my 30 yr old niece and my 40 year old gardener both had pneumonia in the last 2 years. Both healthy young adults so this is very abnormal. Both double jabbed in the UK with Pfizer.
Haven't seen it. I'll try to get to it.
I've had my eye on pneumonia for years, but I shy away from it in podcasts. People don't understand more than raw numbers. When I get into combinations of codes and adjusting for all-cause excess, I lose most people. But it is in my book.
Specifically, from 2020 to 2021, in MA, all-cause excess was cut in half, covid was cut in half, pneumonia unspecified marginal difference from norm was cut in half, viral pneumonia marginal difference from norm was cut in half, AND BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA WENT UP
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36727514/
This is his paper on it. From looking at the video he seems to find a 500% increase in mycoplasma pneumonia in 2024 and 25 using NHS UK statistics.
This breakdown of the data is really eye-opening! I've been trying to learn more about how data visualation choices can either reveal or hide patterns, and your fiscal year vs calendar year comparison nails this perfectly. Working in research myself, I've seen how even well-meaning standardized approaches can mask important singals. The summer excess pattern you identified is def something that deserves deeper investigation.
I used to give presentations to execs of multi-billion dollar companies and to engineers and other intelligent people who were difficult to trick. But I had my ways of manipulating graphs to achieve what I wanted.
John,
------------------
"Diseases do not take out all the dry tinder (unhealthy and old) and then come back around to kill more of the healthy people in subsequent years than it killed of unhealthy people in the first year."
------------------
Great point. In more-than-a-century of epidemiologic records, this phenomenon has "never happened before" (even during the questionable 1918 pandemic). Respiratory diseases do not attack in continued, step-wise, incremental fashion like that.
Thank you John … immunocompromised people…pneumonia is part of the picture leading many different ailments. Proof is out … https://imahealth.substack.com/p/how-did-regulators-miss-dna-contamination?publication_id=389005&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&r=k92dd&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true
Thanks for the update John. How much data must we see and investigate and how many different ways must we do this before what is totally obvious is admitted and something done about it? I wonder.
Al the evidence is in the lack of investigation by health agencies. They have the world fooled as to what epidemiology is. Most of the scientists and doctors on our side are in a cult of "evidence-based." They are playing by the broken rules of a rigged game with rigged data and rigged managers of the "peer review."
You may have already done this, but if not, it would be interesting to look at patterns of unattended deaths over time (ICD-10 codes R90.*), perhaps ratios of pneumonia deaths to unattended deaths by year/FY/ season etc. Rationale being, if the virus itself (vs hospital protocols) was SO deadly, you would have expected large increases of unattended deaths, people not able or willing to get to the hospital in time for life-saving measures when unable to breathe—especially during the pre-omicron era. If however such deaths stayed about the same, it provides more evidence that it was ventilators, sedatives and remdesivir that caused the deaths. As for post-omicron and during the vaccine era, you’d expect unattended deaths to surge. An interrupted time series would be a statistically and visually compelling way to explore these temporal inflection points.
Thinking about the seasonal flu pattern, it seems that the typical winter flu peak is due to human immune deficiency due to loss of winter sun and the impact of cold weather. It is not cause by changes to the virus which is probably present all year round.
Excess death in summer, when immunity should peak is very abnormal then.
Or ... when people retreat to confined areas and share each others' aerosols, then each is more susceptible given the minimum effective dose increase. Or something we aren't even considering. The issue is that they won't study anything.
"Science" has become merely a manifestation of political power.