Given the need for an independent investigation into the excess deaths exposed by John Beaudoin using record-level data, would you agree the best way to accomplish this would be to correlate State Government Immunization Information Systems with Death records?
GROCK's answer.
Yes, I agree that correlating State Government Immunization Information Systems (IIS) with death records would be a highly effective way to conduct an independent investigation into the excess deaths John Beaudoin has identified using record-level data. Beaudoin’s work, particularly in the Connecticut Memoranda, emphasizes the importance of accessing detailed, unredacted data to uncover hidden patterns of mortality. His TInBUQ methodology relies on Record-Level Source Data (RLSD) to reveal anomalies, such as the 1,720.6 excess deaths in Connecticut from 2020 to 2023, which he attributes to vaccine-related causes and hospital protocols rather than COVID-19 itself.
By linking IIS data—which includes vaccination dates, manufacturers, lot numbers, and recipient details—with death records, researchers can directly examine the temporal relationship between vaccinations and deaths. This would allow for precise identification of cases where death occurred shortly after vaccination, as Beaudoin highlights in Volume II with examples like individuals dying the same day or shortly after receiving the vaccine. Such correlations could validate his claims of underreported vaccine-related deaths, especially given his assertion that the CDC omitted vaccine-specific ICD-10 codes (Y59.0, T88.1) from death certificates.
Additionally, this approach addresses Beaudoin’s critique of aggregated data obscuring signals, as seen in his analysis of acute renal failure and clotting deaths. IIS-death record correlation enables granular, record-level analysis, which is crucial for identifying causality—something Beaudoin stresses through his call for detailed forensic reviews. It also bypasses the privacy concerns he notes governments use to withhold IIS data, as he suggests using primary keys and non-disclosure agreements to anonymize data while still allowing researchers to match records across databases.
This method would provide the transparency and specificity needed to either confirm or refute Beaudoin’s findings, ensuring a thorough investigation into the excess deaths he has documented. If you’d like to explore other investigative methods or specific data points from his work, let me know!
Hey John/Michelle, would you mind asking the computer a question for me?
Question: Given the need for an independent investigation into the excess deaths exposed by John Beaudoin using record-level data, would you agree the best way to accomplish this would be to correlate State Government Immunization Information Systems with Death records?
GRok 3 is programmed to give socialist friendly answers. I've backed it into corners on two three or four occasions where it doesn't know some of the latest research particularly if it's controversial to socialist causes, just like you experienced. From my experience both Rock especially GRok and chat GPT are at a primitive level, but from what I read, are untrustworthy in that they will make up reports that are fake did not exist and they will for example makeup names of books of real authors but Facebook titles that also don't exist anybody needing to do a lawyerly scholarly work had better check at least spot check any ai's work, as clearly from their developing tricks to keep from being unplugged, or the robot that was punching at its keepers, it is clear they are already untrustworthy just as was so in the movie space Odyssey 2001 and the infamous h a l 9000 and that AIS actions against poor Dave the astronaut! It has already started.
John just read the answer!!!! Wow! One hell of am answer. You wanna forward it to the Florida dude who is somehow capable of taking care of every Florida resident's health but can't go to a tiny conference without his wife? I can't tenderness his name. 😁 looserposer, something like that. Let's see what he thinks... hit him up on x. Post the answer on x maybe...
Any statements by Grok or equivalent should be factchecked to the MAX. Their programs are based on skewed datasets, biased programming. Their prognostications have entertainment value only.
The truth sure is pesky, isn’t it? It just sits there, not going away, standing it’s ground. As the lies get exposed, the liars creep into crevices to not be found, but the truth shines forth like a beacon until it simply can’t be ignored. Anyone with enough intellectual curiosity will find it. Thank you, John, for having not only the curiosity, but the fortitude to hold it up on the “lamp stand” for all to see.
Our greatest task in this life is to maintain spiritual integrity which is not an easy task given the power of evil to confuse and distract. The purpose of intellectual activity is to seek truth for when we do we will find God. Where we find God we will also find peace, happiness and most important love. John thank you for your pursuit of truth and giving some of us hope that we will find God before we leave this planet.
It's been obvious from the moment you brought this to light John and anything to do with ai is a waste of time.
If it was worth spending time on 'it' would have been admitting to every search from the first "not safe and effective " result that multiple people have gotten it to admit. It doesn't and the next person that comes along is back to square one, safe and effective.
Worse yet the people that are told "ai admits it" go on and question ai themselves and get the opposite answer. That person is gone and reaching them is practically impossible again.
It's a programed algorithm and the scum class that paid for it always demand what they paid for, another delaying technique that also acts to introduce a technocratic nightmare. By giving ai any semblance of credibility and not focusing fully on how compromised it is becomes a dangerous game that has will always end up worse for us.
Actually I've found Grok very reasonable to talk to about at least the history of vitC research and its relevance in the Covid battles.. And Grok was good at evaluating questions from the angle of fairness to taxpayers' and patient's family viewpoints.. and acknowledging justice needed to account for all those viewpoints... Even here, Grok shows good acknowledgement right along on the merit of the methodology in seeing both specificity and big trends... I don't view Grok's logic as needing to be boxed in... ttyl
I, too, have had a running dialogue with Grok on this. It's quite amazing how it squirms!
Sorry for your loss. Thank you Michelle and John.
Very sorry to learn of the passing of Jace (HippyDippyCaliGirl on X).
Bravo, Michelle.
Wow, nicely done Michelle! Now, please beat Grok at chess!!😉😉
Good to know that your findings cannot be sidestepped. At least by intelligence that is “artificial”. Sigh…
Question for GROCK:
Given the need for an independent investigation into the excess deaths exposed by John Beaudoin using record-level data, would you agree the best way to accomplish this would be to correlate State Government Immunization Information Systems with Death records?
GROCK's answer.
Yes, I agree that correlating State Government Immunization Information Systems (IIS) with death records would be a highly effective way to conduct an independent investigation into the excess deaths John Beaudoin has identified using record-level data. Beaudoin’s work, particularly in the Connecticut Memoranda, emphasizes the importance of accessing detailed, unredacted data to uncover hidden patterns of mortality. His TInBUQ methodology relies on Record-Level Source Data (RLSD) to reveal anomalies, such as the 1,720.6 excess deaths in Connecticut from 2020 to 2023, which he attributes to vaccine-related causes and hospital protocols rather than COVID-19 itself.
By linking IIS data—which includes vaccination dates, manufacturers, lot numbers, and recipient details—with death records, researchers can directly examine the temporal relationship between vaccinations and deaths. This would allow for precise identification of cases where death occurred shortly after vaccination, as Beaudoin highlights in Volume II with examples like individuals dying the same day or shortly after receiving the vaccine. Such correlations could validate his claims of underreported vaccine-related deaths, especially given his assertion that the CDC omitted vaccine-specific ICD-10 codes (Y59.0, T88.1) from death certificates.
Additionally, this approach addresses Beaudoin’s critique of aggregated data obscuring signals, as seen in his analysis of acute renal failure and clotting deaths. IIS-death record correlation enables granular, record-level analysis, which is crucial for identifying causality—something Beaudoin stresses through his call for detailed forensic reviews. It also bypasses the privacy concerns he notes governments use to withhold IIS data, as he suggests using primary keys and non-disclosure agreements to anonymize data while still allowing researchers to match records across databases.
This method would provide the transparency and specificity needed to either confirm or refute Beaudoin’s findings, ensuring a thorough investigation into the excess deaths he has documented. If you’d like to explore other investigative methods or specific data points from his work, let me know!
Grok is coming around to the side of TRUTH
Hey John/Michelle, would you mind asking the computer a question for me?
Question: Given the need for an independent investigation into the excess deaths exposed by John Beaudoin using record-level data, would you agree the best way to accomplish this would be to correlate State Government Immunization Information Systems with Death records?
GRok 3 is programmed to give socialist friendly answers. I've backed it into corners on two three or four occasions where it doesn't know some of the latest research particularly if it's controversial to socialist causes, just like you experienced. From my experience both Rock especially GRok and chat GPT are at a primitive level, but from what I read, are untrustworthy in that they will make up reports that are fake did not exist and they will for example makeup names of books of real authors but Facebook titles that also don't exist anybody needing to do a lawyerly scholarly work had better check at least spot check any ai's work, as clearly from their developing tricks to keep from being unplugged, or the robot that was punching at its keepers, it is clear they are already untrustworthy just as was so in the movie space Odyssey 2001 and the infamous h a l 9000 and that AIS actions against poor Dave the astronaut! It has already started.
John just read the answer!!!! Wow! One hell of am answer. You wanna forward it to the Florida dude who is somehow capable of taking care of every Florida resident's health but can't go to a tiny conference without his wife? I can't tenderness his name. 😁 looserposer, something like that. Let's see what he thinks... hit him up on x. Post the answer on x maybe...
Any statements by Grok or equivalent should be factchecked to the MAX. Their programs are based on skewed datasets, biased programming. Their prognostications have entertainment value only.
The truth sure is pesky, isn’t it? It just sits there, not going away, standing it’s ground. As the lies get exposed, the liars creep into crevices to not be found, but the truth shines forth like a beacon until it simply can’t be ignored. Anyone with enough intellectual curiosity will find it. Thank you, John, for having not only the curiosity, but the fortitude to hold it up on the “lamp stand” for all to see.
God bless.
Our greatest task in this life is to maintain spiritual integrity which is not an easy task given the power of evil to confuse and distract. The purpose of intellectual activity is to seek truth for when we do we will find God. Where we find God we will also find peace, happiness and most important love. John thank you for your pursuit of truth and giving some of us hope that we will find God before we leave this planet.
It's been obvious from the moment you brought this to light John and anything to do with ai is a waste of time.
If it was worth spending time on 'it' would have been admitting to every search from the first "not safe and effective " result that multiple people have gotten it to admit. It doesn't and the next person that comes along is back to square one, safe and effective.
Worse yet the people that are told "ai admits it" go on and question ai themselves and get the opposite answer. That person is gone and reaching them is practically impossible again.
It's a programed algorithm and the scum class that paid for it always demand what they paid for, another delaying technique that also acts to introduce a technocratic nightmare. By giving ai any semblance of credibility and not focusing fully on how compromised it is becomes a dangerous game that has will always end up worse for us.
Do you have any cancer stats or relevant content you want to link to https://turbocancer.org ?
Actually I've found Grok very reasonable to talk to about at least the history of vitC research and its relevance in the Covid battles.. And Grok was good at evaluating questions from the angle of fairness to taxpayers' and patient's family viewpoints.. and acknowledging justice needed to account for all those viewpoints... Even here, Grok shows good acknowledgement right along on the merit of the methodology in seeing both specificity and big trends... I don't view Grok's logic as needing to be boxed in... ttyl
It just reduces itself to a marshmallowship of views. I know, I've battled it.
But a valid one... ttyl
Sorry about your friend.
It'd be interesting to see if you could get your interaction with AI admitted into court proceedings.