Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John T's avatar

I agree with the sleight of hand. I think there are other reasons as well. Like with all the blame directed towards the CDC they are keeping the FDA out of the equation. The CDC couldn't recommend any drugs without FDA approval. Like the newest RSV drug approved and recommended in one of the trials it was a partially blind. Why was it approved? You hear RFK and Makary saying Gold Standard and promise kept. It got approved anyway, but if it wouldn't have what would the CDC had to hide?

The focus being data hidden about seizures as a side effect and less deaths with the control drug numbers. Control drug was approved in 1998 and is the same class drug as the other two. The reaction should have been all three of these drugs killed babies in trials. Where is the data from VAERs and FAERs? The FDA should pull these drugs, not worry about seizures. Nope it is CDC, CDC. My thoughts about the CDC are it is a totally unnecessary organization, not defending it.

Expand full comment
Tom Haviland's avatar

Very good article, John! -Tom

Expand full comment
35 more comments...

No posts