Most of public barely getting by, seemingly incapable or unwilling to do a thing about it.
We brought evidence to VA lawmakers, VDH more than once, school boards, city councils- all ignored. All guilty. VDH told us over and over- we follow CDC. No brains or heart of their own. No critical thinking or practical use of their education. Shameful. Sickening. Too many conformed and shut up. Too many controlled by their paycheck to stay in line and just hope it goes quietly. No gathering of big numbers in one accord to demand correction or prosecute. Even Rebeccas mom cannot find a lawyer! Where are any good lawyers? Even if good lawyers, would all be ignored because this was not EUA, this was DOD op— so all usual law entirely overruled. Democide. May the Lord provide mercy. May the nations repent. Revelation 18:23.
When these bad actors wrap their head around the truth that they too will be denied these freedoms or justices and that includes their families, then they'll get it.
May I suggest the senior executives and boards of trustees at all the hospitals that followed the murderous protocols of isolation, use of vents, and remdesivir at the same time restricting Ivermectin and other life-saving medications from use are responsible and just as guilty as any government official?
These monsters or useful idiots deserve the death penalty for what they have done. Maybe then, useful idiot types would think long and hard before committing to a foolish and potentially lethal activity!? One wonders.
As usual, you have done a great job illustrating your points. You are likely aware of another side of the story (i.e., Katherine Watt of BailiwickNews Substack, and others), those who believe that because of laws passed by Congress regarding public health, pandemics, etc., we no longer are under the Constitution of the United States. We are under a public health emergency as declared by the Secretary of HHE for some time, equivalent to martial law. This would seem to be the defense likely used by government in a court of law. Most judges will not go against the federal government. After enough legal cases pass through the various courts and cases are heard by the Supreme Court there may be no decision of consequence. The problem with this mess is that by the time the entirety of the issues is adjudicated and decided, many more people will have been gravely injured or will have died by the hostile actions of our government.
The Founding Fathers, in their writings, have indicated what the only course of action that will unburden us from a tyrannical government is. That being the overthrow of the government. I think we have neither the time or patience to wait judicial resolution (with no guarantee it will favor the people, not the government). We do not have the luxury of time.
Read my prior substack, which is my Amicus brief. The reason none of these cases make it to discovery and trial is Dismissal Doctrines such as Standing, Mootness, or Qualified Immunity.
I wonder if Bea murdered her dog? It's almost as if the public does murder it's a crime. When government does murder it's for our own protection even if it us they are murdering.
I don’t think many millions would agree that the CIA murder of JFK was protecting us. They were protecting their administrative military industrial complex interests.
And when your legal system is owned by those guilty of the crimes, nothing will happen. At least the last two years prove this. Definition of trying the same thing over and over again for the same result…? The system needs to be bought to its knees, destroyed, and rebuilt by the people, for the people. The tribe judges and administrators punishment, not the leaders.
There is a way of wording just this to your local councils and authorities. A reminder that they have been given information they can't ignore so they are put on notice unofficially but officially.
Whoa! Did you know the head of the department of health in MN was vaccine injured herself and her doc reported in VAERS. Yet she continued to push the idea about everybody needs to take the injections. Those in such position of authority must be held accountable.
Thank you for this concise explanation. I have learned this in the past, but my attempts to explain it have missed the mark.
Now, if I may, I have a similar question for you. How does licensing or certification play in to this? Through I do not wish to limit the answer to my situation, I offer it as an example. Back in my days as a blue collar employee, tasks I was to perform required certification in respirators. Amount the many things learned were the following; respirators do NOT protect against viruses and if they don’t, neither can masks. Respirators and masks are not benign, they share many of the same risks to health and life. Use of respirators for any commercial activity requires those using them, and if my memory is correct, their supervisors to be certified in their use. And now the biggie, any supervisor that mandates or even just allows any or all subordinates to use ant protective gear that is not suited for purpose is in violation of various civil and in case of injury or death, criminal laws. As stated earlier, respirators and masks are not suited to the task of stopping viruses.
Now, years after obtaining certification in respirator use I am teaching at three medical universities, two nursing schools and two vocational schools for medical technicians, all of whom mandate masks on campus, even to this day. What is my duty to act as one, most likely the only one in all of these institutions, who is certified in respirator use?
Thank you for this clear explanation and example of legal responsibility.
But what happens when the legal system is set up to dismiss such cases with bullshit like standing?
Also, the prosecutors offices of many areas won't even bring up this as a possibility.
The logic is sound, but the implementation of the legal system is broken.
Lawlessness prevailing. Officials endlessly ignoring.
Most of public barely getting by, seemingly incapable or unwilling to do a thing about it.
We brought evidence to VA lawmakers, VDH more than once, school boards, city councils- all ignored. All guilty. VDH told us over and over- we follow CDC. No brains or heart of their own. No critical thinking or practical use of their education. Shameful. Sickening. Too many conformed and shut up. Too many controlled by their paycheck to stay in line and just hope it goes quietly. No gathering of big numbers in one accord to demand correction or prosecute. Even Rebeccas mom cannot find a lawyer! Where are any good lawyers? Even if good lawyers, would all be ignored because this was not EUA, this was DOD op— so all usual law entirely overruled. Democide. May the Lord provide mercy. May the nations repent. Revelation 18:23.
When these bad actors wrap their head around the truth that they too will be denied these freedoms or justices and that includes their families, then they'll get it.
May I suggest the senior executives and boards of trustees at all the hospitals that followed the murderous protocols of isolation, use of vents, and remdesivir at the same time restricting Ivermectin and other life-saving medications from use are responsible and just as guilty as any government official?
Big cash helped
. . . at the expense of hundreds of thousands of lives. Their behavior was pure evil.
You’ve set the table, John. Soon, hopefully, we eat.
Bea Hatch?? 😂😂
Bi-tch??? ha, ha.
What a great story. Thanks for sharing this.
These monsters or useful idiots deserve the death penalty for what they have done. Maybe then, useful idiot types would think long and hard before committing to a foolish and potentially lethal activity!? One wonders.
As usual, you have done a great job illustrating your points. You are likely aware of another side of the story (i.e., Katherine Watt of BailiwickNews Substack, and others), those who believe that because of laws passed by Congress regarding public health, pandemics, etc., we no longer are under the Constitution of the United States. We are under a public health emergency as declared by the Secretary of HHE for some time, equivalent to martial law. This would seem to be the defense likely used by government in a court of law. Most judges will not go against the federal government. After enough legal cases pass through the various courts and cases are heard by the Supreme Court there may be no decision of consequence. The problem with this mess is that by the time the entirety of the issues is adjudicated and decided, many more people will have been gravely injured or will have died by the hostile actions of our government.
The Founding Fathers, in their writings, have indicated what the only course of action that will unburden us from a tyrannical government is. That being the overthrow of the government. I think we have neither the time or patience to wait judicial resolution (with no guarantee it will favor the people, not the government). We do not have the luxury of time.
Read my prior substack, which is my Amicus brief. The reason none of these cases make it to discovery and trial is Dismissal Doctrines such as Standing, Mootness, or Qualified Immunity.
thank you
I wonder if Bea murdered her dog? It's almost as if the public does murder it's a crime. When government does murder it's for our own protection even if it us they are murdering.
I don’t think many millions would agree that the CIA murder of JFK was protecting us. They were protecting their administrative military industrial complex interests.
And when your legal system is owned by those guilty of the crimes, nothing will happen. At least the last two years prove this. Definition of trying the same thing over and over again for the same result…? The system needs to be bought to its knees, destroyed, and rebuilt by the people, for the people. The tribe judges and administrators punishment, not the leaders.
Beat to quarters!
That'll be one heck of a class action suit. 😂🤣
There is a way of wording just this to your local councils and authorities. A reminder that they have been given information they can't ignore so they are put on notice unofficially but officially.
Whoa! Did you know the head of the department of health in MN was vaccine injured herself and her doc reported in VAERS. Yet she continued to push the idea about everybody needs to take the injections. Those in such position of authority must be held accountable.
They knew!
Thank you for this concise explanation. I have learned this in the past, but my attempts to explain it have missed the mark.
Now, if I may, I have a similar question for you. How does licensing or certification play in to this? Through I do not wish to limit the answer to my situation, I offer it as an example. Back in my days as a blue collar employee, tasks I was to perform required certification in respirators. Amount the many things learned were the following; respirators do NOT protect against viruses and if they don’t, neither can masks. Respirators and masks are not benign, they share many of the same risks to health and life. Use of respirators for any commercial activity requires those using them, and if my memory is correct, their supervisors to be certified in their use. And now the biggie, any supervisor that mandates or even just allows any or all subordinates to use ant protective gear that is not suited for purpose is in violation of various civil and in case of injury or death, criminal laws. As stated earlier, respirators and masks are not suited to the task of stopping viruses.
Now, years after obtaining certification in respirator use I am teaching at three medical universities, two nursing schools and two vocational schools for medical technicians, all of whom mandate masks on campus, even to this day. What is my duty to act as one, most likely the only one in all of these institutions, who is certified in respirator use?
Bea Hatch needs a Snickers bar... :)