Factual Allegations - Part 1
13. ... Between August 2020 and May 2021, Plaintiff completed the first year of law school.
14. In 2021, MSLaw instituted a policy of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination citing CDC and FDA recommendations as reasons for their new policy.
15. … MSLaw offered religious exemptions and made applications for such exemption available to students and staff.
16. … Plaintiff timely applied for the religious exemption. To date, MSLaw has neither approved nor denied Plaintiff’s application for a religious exemption. Rather, on August 27, 2021, prior to the close of registration for Fall 2021 classes, Plaintiff received a letter from MSLaw explaining his obligation to repay his student loan. From this letter, Plaintiff determined that he had been unenrolled from MSLaw without prior notice and before the close of registration.
17. On November 15, 2021, Plaintiff sent an M.G.L. c. 93A Demand letter to MSLaw requesting relief. (see Exhibit D)
18. On December 17, 2021, MSLaw responded to Plaintiff’s 93A Demand letter, again citing CDC and FDA declarations, which is based, in part, on misinformation from MA DPH. (see Exhibit E)
19. On or about February 3, 2022, Plaintiff read a news report that a healthy 7-year- old girl died from COVID-19 in Groton, Massachusetts. Knowing this to be nearly impossible, Plaintiff decided to examine the data.
20. Through a Public Records Request to MA DPH for Vital Records, in and around March 2022, Plaintiff received and subsequently began investigating Death Certificates in Massachusetts. Of particular interest are the ICD-10 codes. According to the CDC, these .. .
“codes are currently the cornerstone of classifying diseases, injuries, health encounters and inpatient procedures in morbidity settings. U.S. public health officials at the federal, state, and local level rely on the receipt of . . . coded data from HIPAA-covered entities to conduct many disease-related activities. CDC programs use [these] codes to conduct surveillance (e.g., chronic disease and injury surveillance, health care utilization, health care-associated adverse events), for case findings lists to identify cases of reportable cancers and certain birth defects and disabilities, and to provide public use data files for public analysis.”
Text from CDC found here.
21. Within the Death Certificates produced by MA DPH, the Plaintiff located the Death Certificate of Cassidy Baracka, from Groton, Massachusetts. She was 7-years-old when she died on January 18, 2022. Cassidy’s Death Certificate, SFN 5980 Year 2022, contained four causes of death ICD-10 codes: U071 “COVID-19”, B49 “unspecified mycosis” (“Mycosis” is defined as an infection or disease caused by a fungus.), J450 “predominantly allergic asthma”, R091 “pleurisy”.
The ICD-10 codes used by the MA DPH to identify causes of death are listed on the Public Health Information Tool section of the MA DPH website at https://www.mass.gov/service-details/icd-10-codes-used-for-phit-death-data.
The causes of death, in narrative form, are in the fields CODIA, CODIB, CODIC, CODID, and CONDII and stated, “COMPLICATIONS OF CORONAVIRUS-19 VIRAL INFECTION, FUNGAL AND BACTERIAL PLEURITIS.” (see EXHIBIT F, Pages 3, 11, 18, 122) There is no mention of COVID-19 vaccination, nor is there a code of Y590 “Viral vaccines” or T881 “Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified” listed anywhere in this Death Certificate.
Pages 3, 11, 18, 122 from Exhibit F
End of Cassidy’s Exhibit F Excerpts
22. On or about March 2022, Plaintiff then loaded the 2022 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (“VAERS”) file from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS") website (HHS.gov) and searched for 7-year-old females from Massachusetts who died January 2022. Of concern was the following entry: VAERS_ID 2038120 in 2022 was of a 7-year-old female from Massachusetts, VAX_DATE = “1/13/2022,” ONSET_DATE = “1/15/2022,” PRIOR_VAX = “Severe nausea and vomiting from 5min post vaccination and for the next 8-10 hours,” SYMPTOM_TEXT = “Spiked a 103 fever, severe stomachache, has not had a bowel movement since the day before vaccination, which makes 3 days without one. First vaccine caused severe nausea and vomiting from 5minutes post injection and for the next 8-10 hours.” (see EXHIBIT F, Page 18) There is no follow-up in VAERS after the January 15, 2022 report. Plaintiff believes the VAERS report is of Cassidy Baracka, who died January 18, 2022, three days after this VAERS report was made and five days after receipt of the COVID-19 vaccine.
23. In and around June 2022, Plaintiff, through a subsequent Public Records Request, received updated records from MA DPH.
24. Plaintiff also attempted to obtain Cassidy’s immunization records to ascertain the time and date of vaccination for COVID-19. However, the MA DPH denied the request citing privacy law as the basis for denial.
25. Upon information and belief learned in or around March or April of 2022, Charles Casella, then 48-years-old, did not want to get the COVID-19 vaccination, but his employer, Bose Corporation, informed him he must get it, else his employment would be terminated. Upon information and belief, the day before the deadline for termination, Casella conceded and obtained the COVID-19 vaccination. The next morning, on November 16, 2021, Casella was found deceased in bed.
26. Plaintiff located and examined Casella’s Death Certificate. (see EXHIBIT F, Pages 3 and 16) Indeed, Charles Casella did die on November 16, 2021. Indeed, he was 48-years-old. Speciously, the record indicated that he died from “COVID-19” and glaringly missing was mention of COVID-19 vaccination within 24-hours of his death.
27. On January 16, 2021, Solomon A. Kizitoh expired. SFN_NUMBER is 11199 in the year 2021. The listed medical examiner is Rebecca Dedrick. The CODIA/B/C/D and CONDII fields on his Death Certificate stated, “ACUTE BRONCHOPNEUMONIA AND IDIOPATHIC - THROMBOCYTOPENIA FOLLOWING COVID-19 VACCINATION”, which happened in only “DAYS” before death and stated conditions contributing to death being, “HYPERTENSIVE AND ATHEROSCLEROTIC CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE”. The ICD-10 codes are listed as: Y590 = “Viral vaccines”, D696 = “Thrombocytopenia, unspecified”, I119 = “Hypertensive heart disease without (congestive) heart failure”, I250 = “Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, so described”, J180 = “Bronchopneumonia, unspecified”, and T881 = “Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified.” (see EXHIBIT F, Pages 5 and 69) Solomon’s is the only record in more than 420,000 records from 2015 through May of 2022 in which Y590 or T881 was used in a Death Certificate. That is, Solomon’s is the only record in Massachusetts since the COVID-19 vaccine to actually list the vaccine as a cause of death in ICD-10 codes tracked by the CDC.
28. During 2021 and 2022, nine (9) Death Certificates, including Solomon Kizitoh’s, contained narratives in the CODIA/B/C/D and CONDII fields that the COVID-19 vaccine had been recently administered to the decedent. Despite the narrative indicating the administration of the COVID-19 vaccines, the ICD-10 codes Y590 = “Viral vaccines” and T881 = “Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified” were omitted from eight (8) of the nine (9) Death Certificates. (see EXHIBIT F, Page 5) The only way to find Death Certificates in which vaccination is mentioned as a cause or contributing condition of death is to read the individual Death Certificates or do a string search of multiple fields, as Plaintiff has done. Some of the other causes of death listed on the eight (8) Death Certificates omitting Y590 and T881 are arrhythmia, heart failure, thrombocytopenia, hemorrhagic stroke, and Guillain Barré Syndrome. Plaintiff noticed that all causes mentioned in narrative fields are correlated to ICD-10 code fields in all Death Certificates with the notable exception of the Y590 and T881 omitted from all but one single Death Certificate.
Summary of Factual Allegations - Part 1
By now, the reader should understand:
what a VAERS record is,
what “narrative fields” are on death certificates, and
what “coded fields” (ICD-10 codes) are on death certificates.
There are three strongly linked and likely vaccine-caused deaths in this first Factual Allegations article.
Put yourself in the position of a chancellor who decides what is best for the public interest. He weighs the balance of equities to determine the level of harm and benefit for allowing the relief sought or denying the relief sought. Could you in good conscience allow these vaccines to be given to children and adults? How about babies 6 months old to 5 years? These vaccines have not been through robust clinical trials. The public is the experiment, the guinea pigs, the lab rats. Goodnight Ben.
I don’t know if anyone will get that movie reference. If you’re under 55yo, you may have to look it up.
Thank you a brilliant summary of death by vaxx. We know so many who have died
post vaxx when their cancers, in remission, came rip roaring back, spread all over the body and that was that. Vaxxing children is an outrage. Vaxxing the aged is criminal as well.
Hi!
I read and studied your court case (no case number yet) last evening, 8-26-22.
It was insightful to say the least.
I shared it on www.activatehumanity.com yesterday.
This is happening all over the world - deaths and injuries from the injections.
There is a court case filed in Utah in March 2022 and argued on July 6, 2022 showing that the so-called vaccines are NOT vaccines by lawful definition but "gene therapy," a medical treatment, and people have the right to refuse any medical treatment via bodily autonomy.
You can see the court case and more on www.prosecutenow.com
See also Dr. Fleming's video on the website - very revealing and his new book which I have in my library.
Furthermore, my husband was "kidnapped" called body snatching and human trafficking when he arrived to the emergency room (May 2021) of a local hospital in MAINE by ambulance due to a fall at home and needing sutures regarding his head injury.
He was given a "fake" PCR test and declared that he had covid, a fake diagnosis, and "locked up" for 9 days. He didn't have his hearing aids in his ears, couldn't hear the staff, and was NOT provided with "informed consent."
Hospital had "full" power and control over the situation, and NO visitors were allowed.
Forget advocating for him over time; I was surrounded by a security guard on day 9.
A very tall Physical Therapist was called to speak with me. I told him that he had to follow the laws just like I had to when I worked in hospitals.
Shortly thereafter, I was told that husband would be discharged.
Why he came out alive is beyond our comprehension.
Hospital records does NOT show that he was treated for a "virus" but for preexisting conditions.
So why lock him up?
Financial incentive?
Call it covid and the money pours in.
That is NOT why he went to the emergency room.
At the time, we had NO knowledge of what actually happened and the financial incentives paid to hospitals, etc.
I have learned plenty since.
I am attempting to find a lawyer to take this "kidnap" case but NO luck so far.
What I see that is lacking is a community of like minded people who can support each other in various ways especially provide information of resources available such as finding a lawyer and much more.
Hope you win your court case.
Thank you!
Lise from Maine (former licensed clinician)