A vaccine opera 6

Count III - Wire fraud; Count IV - Detrimental reliance on 3rd party statements

COUNT III - VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 1343 FRAUD BY WIRE, RADIO, OR TELEVISION

Against All Defendants

50. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1343,

“Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with, a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), or affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.”

(OOPS!!!! Just now realizing I misnumbered the complaint. TWO 50’s. Oh well. Sorry, your Honor.)

50. As alleged herein, the Defendants purposely, knowingly, or recklessly entered false misinformation on Death Certificates, that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts derived payment benefit from the U.S. federal funds set aside for COVID-19 based on that false misinformation entered, and that the information falsely entered was recorded and sent to the CDC as vital records influencing CDC’s recommendations for COVID-19 mitigation measures including vaccination.

51. As alleged herein, the Defendants transmitted and/or uploaded by wire the Commonwealth’s Death Certificates for the calendar years 2020, 2021, 2022 to various federal agencies’ software systems, including those of the CDC and FDA. These Death Certificates contained misinformation regarding COVID-19 as the alleged cause of death, or the omission of the COVID-19 vaccination as a cause or contributing cause of death.

---

COUNT IV - DETRIMENTAL RELIANCE ON FALSE STATEMENTS BY THIRD PARTIES

Against All Defendants

53. Under Pasternack v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, 807 F.3d 14 (2d Cir. 2015), the 2d Circuit held that the reliance element of fraud is not necessarily established through a third party. However, under Pasternack v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, 2016 N.Y.Slip.Op. 05179 (June 30, 2016), the NY Court of Appeals stated that if the question to the 2d Circuit had been reformulated to be:

“Whether a plaintiff may establish the reliance element of a cause of action for fraud under New York law by showing that a third party relied on a defendant's false statements resulting in injury to the plaintiff where the statements were made with the intent of influencing the plaintiff and causing injury.”

then the conclusion would be

“that the reliance element of a cause of action for fraud may be established through evidence that a third party relied on the alleged misrepresentation if the misrepresentation was made with the intent of influencing the plaintiff and causing injury.”

54. As alleged herein, MA DPH and their medical examiner agents engaged in a pattern of purposely fraudulent activity in adding U071 codes to Death Certificates when COVID-19 was not a cause of death and omitting Y590 or T881 from Death Certificates in which they knew or should have known that the COVID-19 vaccine was almost certainly a cause of death. The purposeful activity was part of an enterprise intended to garner disaster relief money from the federal government for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and for the hospitals and other businesses of Massachusetts.

55. As alleged herein the Defendants made misrepresentations to the CDC, FDA, and, by extension, MSLaw, upon which MSLaw relied and instituted a rule of required COVID-19 vaccination, injuring Plaintiff. Other law schools also relied on the Defendants’ misrepresentations and also instituted rules requiring COVID-19 vaccination, further injuring Plaintiff in depriving him of rights afforded COVID-19 vaccinated people. Third party liability extends through MSLaw to the Plaintiff where the Defendants made the misrepresentations knowing that third parties including MSLaw and Plaintiff would rely on the misrepresentations.

---

Count III, elements being obvious by its name, have been satisfied in the evidence. The CDC and FDA certainly received the death certificate data by wire or transmission via some electronic means. The mens rea, or intent to devise the schema of fraud and intent to transmit the results of the fraud to HHS divisions, will further come forth during discovery. Else, it can be shown that defendants (“∆’s”) knew or should have known that such information funnels up to HHS divisions.

All in all, Count III seems like a slam dunk … like the other Counts.

---

Count IV is a little more complicated and relies on vicarious liability law theory and stare decisis around “third party” statements. There are cases with decisions that fall on either side of the argument. The requirement is that the third party rely on the fraudulent statements and that the ∆’s intended for the third party to rely on the fraudulent statements. “Intent,” in law, meaning mens rea, can be negligent, reckless, knowing, or purposeful depending on the statute or case law being used. In this case/situation, ∆’s would be hard pressed to explain how they did not know that all parties downstream from the fraud would be reliant upon it. The entire purpose of coding for causes is to gather data in order to warn the public.

Certainly the medical examiners and other ∆’s through respondeat superior were knowing of the purpose of death certificate coding and its use in the context of the present COVID-19 society and culture in the throes of the COVID-19 purported pandemic. They knew or should have known that decisions of vaccine mandates, mask mandates, and other coercive measures were being instituted at schools, universities, and other organizations based upon the data the ∆’s entered on death certificates.

---

Summary

This is nuts, isn’t it? The government of Massachusetts, most hospitals, most medical examiners, many doctors, pharma personnel and executives, medical boards, medical licensing state board, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and other individuals and organizations across USA and throughout the world not only have acted unethically, but many have acted criminally, and seemingly stood by knowingly as they watched people die because of the fraudulent misrepresentations on death certificates.