Two-sided solution

Common benefit to both pro & anti vax blocs

Much thanks to Steve Kirsch, Nick Hudson, and Dr. Henry Ealy, who invited and encouraged this author to participate in their groups and begin writing articles.

---

C19 “vaccine” - the cause of causes and Scienter, not science raised earnest questions about the covid vaccines. This article proposes legislation for the benefit of both sides of the debate. Please read, copy, and meme to social media.

---

Introduction

On the issue of covid vaccination, the general public, physicians, scientists, and politicians are split. Consensus absconds for lack of transparent, quality data studies and for legal battles won based on power, not evidence. Frenetic social media debates persist despite governments and oligarchs spending $Billions on biased RCT studies, media advertising, and press releases. Economic inefficiency subsumes the current paradigm.

NHS in UK and CDC in USA gather vital statistics on births, marriages, deaths, and disease, then aggregate them into publicly available files. The current death certificate schema precludes cross-correlating vaccination status against cause-of-death, age, gender, or other variables because vaccination status is not included in death certificates. For example, in the Massachusetts death certificate data set, the string “*vaccin*” appeared in ~ 0.02% of the records in 2021 and 2022 (~ 20 out of ~ 83,000).

The ability to cross-correlate the vaccination database with the death certificate database will serve the public interest in solving economic and societal issues such as public health and welfare. The public has a right to know; and the government has a duty of care to the public to make the information available.

The most efficient solution, and a solution meeting the common goal (transparency) of both sides of the vaccination argument, is to require vaccination dates and types be included on death certificates from present time forward and retroactively to June 2020 (in order to capture clinical trial people from 2020).

---

Vital Records Statutes

Each government enacted laws to keep vital statistics, including death certificates. Here are the laws from a few jurisdictions.

New Hampshire, USA can be found HERE:

2019 New Hampshire Revised Statutes

TITLE I - THE STATE AND ITS GOVERNMENT

CHAPTER 5-C - VITAL RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

SECTION 5-C:62 Death Registration Forms

United Kingdom can be found HERE:

UK Public General Acts

Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953

CHAPTER 20 (1 & 2 Eliz. 2)

PART II - REGISTRATION OF DEATHS

Arizona, USA can be found HERE:

2021 Arizona Revised Statutes

Title 36 - Public Health and Safety

Chapter 3 - VITAL RECORDS AND PUBLIC HEALTH STATISTICS

Article 3 - Death Registration and Birth Registration Certificate Requirements

§36-325 Death certificate registration; moving human remains; immunity

Massachusetts, USA can be found HERE:

PART I - ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT

Title VII - CITIES, TOWNS AND DISTRICTS

Chapter 46: RETURN AND REGISTRY OF BIRTHS, MARRIAGES AND DEATHS

Section 9: Death certificates; issuance; contents; declaration of death by nurse, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant

Section 33: Centralized, automated database for vital records and statistics; certified copies issued from database; capacity requirements of database; maintenance and preservation of original paper records

---

Immunization Records Statutes

Some jurisdictions enacted statutes to create and maintain a database of citizens’ immunization status. This is not available or complete in all jurisdictions. In New Hampshire, for example, as part of N.H. Code Admin. R. He-P 307 - IMMUNIZATION/VACCINATION REGISTRY, there is a section, 307.06 - Procedures for Patients to Opt Out of the Registry, that allows patients to opt out of the registry. Given that many people will not opt out, there likely exists a robust database from which authorized New Hampshire state personnel can import into the state’s death certificate database.

Massachusetts enacted the following statutory schema found HERE:

PART I - ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT

Title XVI - PUBLIC HEALTH

Chapter 111: PUBLIC HEALTH

Section 24M: Computerized immunization registry

Further, Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 111, Sections 3 and 24M (M.G.L. c. 111 § 3 & § 24M) provide the regulatory authority for the creation of the MASSACHUSETTS IMMUNIZATION INFORMATION SYSTEM (MIIS) codified under Code of Massachusetts Regulations, Title 105, Section 222 (105 CMR 222.00) found HERE and HERE.

---

Economic analysis

As seen in these statutes, many jurisdictions maintain databases of both death certificates and vaccination status, making it cheap and easy to automatically import vaccination status into the death certificate database so that studies can be performed in the interest of public health and welfare.

Several readers and acquaintances from Massachusetts provided anecdotes of someone vaccinated for covid who died shortly after receiving an injection. Some of the deaths are detailed in C19 “vaccine” - the cause of causes and Scienter, not science. However, there is no way to officially confirm the dates of vaccination because vaccinations are not listed on the death certificates.

How much will it cost to add vaccination dates and types to the death certificates retroactively and on an ongoing basis?

Death certificates have 316 columns (fields) on a spreadsheet. Adding the immunization information will likely require no more than 32 columns be added, 8 for each immunization event, and 4 events.

An estimate of the project cost to retroactively import immunization information into the new death certificate columns (fields) is ~ $10, 000 to $50,000.

The return value of the resultant statistics to governments, pharmaceutical companies, and the public interest is clearly in the $Millions, perhaps $Billions. The eventual data studies will fill gaps in knowledge and provide both sides of the argument evidence to clarify and maybe end the causal attribution debate.

An estimate of the ongoing cost derives from a few seconds for a Medical Examiner to press an “import immunization information from MIIS” button on the death certificate entry system. These are negligible costs.

Given:

60,000 deaths per year

10 seconds extra per death certificate (push the import button)

$50/hour for death certificate coders

Result:

~ 167 hours of extra work per year

~ $8,333 cost per year

This is the cost for such valuable information that could save thousands of lives and avoid $Millions in legal actions in Massachusetts, or millions of lives and $Billions in legal actions worldwide.

For the few cases not in the MIIS system, a very conservative one-hour per record for medical coder investigation time (phone calls, emails et al) is offered. Assuming a conservative 1% of records do not have immunization records, the total annual cost would be 600 records * $50/hour = $30,000.

Pecuniarily, there is no reason to reject new legislation that would require death certificates to contain immunization information.

---

Risk

Vaccination has added such heft to medical records that applying all vaccinations to death certificates would be overly burdensome. The USA Immunization Schedules can be found HERE and include: Hepatitis B (3 doses), Rotavirus (2 doses), Diphtheria, tetanus, & acellular pertussis (4 doses), Haemophilus influenza type b (4 doses), Pneumococcal conjugate (4 doses), Inactivated poliovirus (3 doses), Influenza (1 or 2 doses annually), Measles, mumps, rubella (1 dose), Varicella (1 dose), Hepatitis A (2 doses), Tdap again, HPV, Meningococcal, Meningococcal B, Pneumococcal polysaccharide, Dengue, and others.

To alleviate risk of non-compliance of the proposed statute due to great burden, the statute should limit the requirement of immunization records on death certificates to the current and prior two years. For example, if the current calendar year is 2022 and if someone received an injection for varicella in January 2020, then it would be included on the death certificate; and December 2019 would not be included.

Given the large number of immunizations received by infants and young children, and the fact that few infants and children die, their entire immunization record should be captured and placed in a text field on the death certificate, which data analysts could easily parse during data studies.

No other risks are immediately apparent.

---

Benefits

Pharmaceutical companies incur costs of $Millions and $Billions each for trials of a given pharmaceutical product. In the case of the covid “vaccine” (in quotes because it is not a traditional vaccine, but rather a new technology product never before injected into humans en masse; they changed the definition of the word “vaccine” in 2020 to make this shot more marketable and acceptable to the public), immunity from tort (lawsuit) was given by governments to the pharma companies. This shifted the burden of precautions, in pecuniary trial costs, from the pharma companies to the public, in the form of risk of adverse outcomes such as maim or death. Thus, the benefit of including immunization information on death certificates is that it enables data studies of the most important type, which is of saving human life.

There is no better data study than the millions of people given the covid “vaccine” in Massachusetts and the results found in the death certificate database combined with immunization information from MIIS.

The only reason not to enact such legislation as proposed herein is to obfuscate, hide, willfully ignore, or bury truth and facts surrounding this “vaccine”. Both sides will benefit from transparency, though the fate of pharmaceutical companies will rest on the facts.

---

Equity

In a court of equity, known for justice and fairness in the absence of specific law, three of the analyses performed by a judge are: balance of equities (harms vs benefits to both parties), public interest effects of a decision one way or another, and the possibility of an immediate irreparable injury.

For brevity, it is left to the reader to ponder the social, economic, and legal implications of the public interest, balance of harms, and possibility of immediate injury. Imagine all the wasted time arguing on social media suddenly being solved.

To summarize equity, it is worth a few thousand dollars per year to ensure that thousands are not being killed and maimed by an experimental injection. It is worth a few thousand dollars per year to have the best study in the world available to all the public to judge the safety of an injectable product.

---

Legislation

There are many ways to statutorily implement the recommendations herein:

• Mass. GL c.46 Section 9 can be amended

• There can be added a new Section 35 under Chapter 46

• The entire schema of c46 §1 and §9 and c111 §24M and 105 CMR 222 can be amended to include the recommendations

The CDC maintains a database named Immunization Information System (IIS), core data elements of which can be found HERE. Missing from the CDC’s IIS core data elements is a field that allows the vaccine administering provider to add notes for any anomalies, reactions, mistakes, or adverse conditions or events that occurred while the vaccinee was at the facility or in the care of the vaccine administering provider. This should be remedied by inclusion of such a field in all state and federal IIS systems and in all nations.

Example text of Bill to drive implementation

IMMUNIZATION PUBLIC SAFETY BILL “CdC-1”

AN ACT IMPROVING PUBLIC SAFETY IN IMMUNIZATIONS

The purpose of “CdC-1” is to facilitate and promote the use of the Massachusetts Immunization Information System (MIIS) in conjunction with the VITAL records death certificate system to improve immunization safety for citizens in the Commonwealth.

SECTION 1: Death certificate inclusion of immunization records

Section 1. (a) “Immunization records” for this section shall include, at a minimum, for each immunization event of the decedent, the following “Vaccination Event Data Elements” to be taken from the then-current immunization information system such as MIIS defined in 105 CMR 222 as per requirement of Mass. G.L. c.111 §24M:

(1) Vaccination administration date

(2) Vaccine dose volume

(3) Vaccine dose volume units

(4) Vaccine expiration date

(5) Vaccine lot number

(6) Vaccine product

(7) Vaccine route of administration

(8) Vaccine site of administration

(b) The death certificate certifier shall ensure the death certificate includes the immunization records of the decedent through and including the year of death and the two years prior to the year of death.

(c) For children under eighteen years of age, the entire immunization record text shall be placed a text field such as CONDII on the death certificate.

(d) This section shall be enforced for all deaths that occurred on or after June 1, 2020.

---

Conclusion

The most efficient solution to meet the common goal of public health, safety, and welfare is through data transparency that allows data analysts to parse, research, and report on cross-correlation results from immunization and death certificate records.

The implementation of law and logistics herein provided is extremely pecuniarily inexpensive and yet provides immense value to researchers and the public interest.

There is no virtuous reason that this legislation should not immediately be enacted.