Nicely done John. Sadly my brain cannot process the bulk of it, but I will run it through my summary software for it to give me the summary of what is happening. I do get the gist of the article and the number of cases dismissed and how the judicial system has lost its ever loving mind.
“The rights to dispute resolution, due process, and trials for lawsuits are foundational for American society to remain civil.”
and, three paragraphs later:
“The U.S. Court system refuses meritorious cases en masse; and if not soon corrected, the United States society and nation are in peril of mortal fracture.”
In my opinion, juxtaposing these two sentences succinctly puts forth a very real danger to the Republic presented by one aspect (there are others) of a fast-failing court system.
John, your article is very well-written, minus some miscellaneous typos. I agree wholeheartedly with your conclusions. All the data is substantiated, and this issue needs to be go viral as it goes to the very heart of American society.
I sidntbproof read upon transfer. I can edit on sybstack jn the coming days. I just wanted to get out there. I will need amicus briefs supporting my petition.
"oppression is codified in qualified immunity, a doctrine that has no basis in the Constitution or the laws passed by the people’s representatives. It is a judicial invention, a legal fiction crafted from thin air to sever the link of accountability between the state and its masters."
The Qualified Immunity Deception
A 150-Year-Old Fraud. A Betrayal of the Constitution. A Roadmap to Reclaiming Our Rights.
"Reclaiming our sovereignty begins with exposing this truth. The people must understand that qualified immunity is not law, but a deception. This understanding is gaining traction in the halls of Congress itself, where legislative efforts seek to correct this century-old error. A prime example is the Ending Qualified Immunity Act, a bill introduced to amend Section 1983 and explicitly state that the defense of qualified immunity is not available for government officials, thereby restoring the original intent of the 1871 law."
Perhaps more of our wasted taxpayer dollars spent on the "defense" of the nation via the Department of War could instead be used on the genuine defense of the nation via the Department of Justice?
In the meantime, little folk like me can at least take pleasure in seeing that the lockdown didn't fully succeed at destroying Bart's!
I remember one year I came back from university for the summer and Bart's was completely under water. The water level reached up to Palisado Ave next to Arthur Drug store.
Probably 1984. I was in a bad car accident on June 6, 1984 and at Mount Sinai Hospital 2.5 weeks, then in a hospital bed in my living room for some time.
So I probably only saw it once and then was laid up after that. Back to school in mid-August.
Thanks for researching this and ringing the alarm. Incidentally, shifting over to the state courts, isn’t there similarly a plausible connection between the criminal courts/prosecutorial system shirking their responsibility for expeditiously processing cases and the recent phenomena of 1) eliminating bail, and 2)raising the threshold for prosecutable offenses? In the case of bail, you had a situation where both sides of the government (courts and DA) abused bail to encourage plea deals, thus saving the courts and prosecutors the rather appreciable expense of taking a case to trial. Then, the people, having some sense of the injustice and unfair play for “the little guy,” overcompensated by foolishly lowering or eliminating the ability of the prosecutor to request bail and, in effect, forcing a dismissal or a jury trial. Then, the prosecutor—the executive branch—responds by basically saying, “well, we don’t have the manpower and we can’t afford to take a shoplifting charge to court, and the courts are all hiding behind their plexiglass shields and face masks, and we no longer have a bail system that keeps the defendant in jail (for lack of personal resources) that formerly had acted as a disincentive to go to trial—often with a public defender—therefore we’re just going to raise the threshold for a prosecutable offense.” Result: justice in the streets.
Yes. The criminal court scope creep far more obvious as the DAs act as criminal conspirators to foster subversion of law. I just don’t have the time for that, but everything you wrote is spot on.
We need to take back the grand juries from the corrupt prosecutors.
Have you reached out to any legal research organizations or law schools to get this research published? That is the best way to get it into the SCOTUS. Then other Pro Se'ers et al can reference that "official" research and use that as argument.
Bingo.., you pointed out the ways the system corrupted itself.
They aren't listening but eventually they will.
The revolution will not be televised.
Why?
Because more and more people are losing faith in this sham and in other shams.
When they lose our trust, they have nothing else to do but serve the truth.
Nicely done John. Sadly my brain cannot process the bulk of it, but I will run it through my summary software for it to give me the summary of what is happening. I do get the gist of the article and the number of cases dismissed and how the judicial system has lost its ever loving mind.
I should've told people how to approach it.
Look at the graphs first.
Then read the conclusion.
Then read the Abstract.
And if you want to keep reading after those, all the details are there.
Great analysis, thank you.
“The rights to dispute resolution, due process, and trials for lawsuits are foundational for American society to remain civil.”
and, three paragraphs later:
“The U.S. Court system refuses meritorious cases en masse; and if not soon corrected, the United States society and nation are in peril of mortal fracture.”
In my opinion, juxtaposing these two sentences succinctly puts forth a very real danger to the Republic presented by one aspect (there are others) of a fast-failing court system.
John, your article is very well-written, minus some miscellaneous typos. I agree wholeheartedly with your conclusions. All the data is substantiated, and this issue needs to be go viral as it goes to the very heart of American society.
I sidntbproof read upon transfer. I can edit on sybstack jn the coming days. I just wanted to get out there. I will need amicus briefs supporting my petition.
"oppression is codified in qualified immunity, a doctrine that has no basis in the Constitution or the laws passed by the people’s representatives. It is a judicial invention, a legal fiction crafted from thin air to sever the link of accountability between the state and its masters."
The Qualified Immunity Deception
A 150-Year-Old Fraud. A Betrayal of the Constitution. A Roadmap to Reclaiming Our Rights.
https://dejuremedia.substack.com/p/the-qualified-immunity-deception
Right on target.
QI
SI
Standing
Mootness
Ripeness
12(b)(6) Failure to state a claim
8(a)(2) "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” from Twiqbal “plausible on its face”
Our most foundational rights and the primary mission of the courts is subjugated by these attenuated doctrines of habitual dismissal.
We lose. The government wins. ONE MILLION dead Americans as a result. And that’s just Covid. Many more from other issues not heard.
"Reclaiming our sovereignty begins with exposing this truth. The people must understand that qualified immunity is not law, but a deception. This understanding is gaining traction in the halls of Congress itself, where legislative efforts seek to correct this century-old error. A prime example is the Ending Qualified Immunity Act, a bill introduced to amend Section 1983 and explicitly state that the defense of qualified immunity is not available for government officials, thereby restoring the original intent of the 1871 law."
https://dejuremedia.substack.com/p/the-qualified-immunity-deception
Perhaps more of our wasted taxpayer dollars spent on the "defense" of the nation via the Department of War could instead be used on the genuine defense of the nation via the Department of Justice?
In the meantime, little folk like me can at least take pleasure in seeing that the lockdown didn't fully succeed at destroying Bart's!
Do you mean Bart's in Windsor, CT?
I do!
LOL
I remember one year I came back from university for the summer and Bart's was completely under water. The water level reached up to Palisado Ave next to Arthur Drug store.
Sounds like the flood of 1984, although there was also one in 82. That was quite the show!
Probably 1984. I was in a bad car accident on June 6, 1984 and at Mount Sinai Hospital 2.5 weeks, then in a hospital bed in my living room for some time.
So I probably only saw it once and then was laid up after that. Back to school in mid-August.
Thanks for researching this and ringing the alarm. Incidentally, shifting over to the state courts, isn’t there similarly a plausible connection between the criminal courts/prosecutorial system shirking their responsibility for expeditiously processing cases and the recent phenomena of 1) eliminating bail, and 2)raising the threshold for prosecutable offenses? In the case of bail, you had a situation where both sides of the government (courts and DA) abused bail to encourage plea deals, thus saving the courts and prosecutors the rather appreciable expense of taking a case to trial. Then, the people, having some sense of the injustice and unfair play for “the little guy,” overcompensated by foolishly lowering or eliminating the ability of the prosecutor to request bail and, in effect, forcing a dismissal or a jury trial. Then, the prosecutor—the executive branch—responds by basically saying, “well, we don’t have the manpower and we can’t afford to take a shoplifting charge to court, and the courts are all hiding behind their plexiglass shields and face masks, and we no longer have a bail system that keeps the defendant in jail (for lack of personal resources) that formerly had acted as a disincentive to go to trial—often with a public defender—therefore we’re just going to raise the threshold for a prosecutable offense.” Result: justice in the streets.
Yes. The criminal court scope creep far more obvious as the DAs act as criminal conspirators to foster subversion of law. I just don’t have the time for that, but everything you wrote is spot on.
We need to take back the grand juries from the corrupt prosecutors.
https://therealcdc.substack.com/p/habitual-dismissals-of-meritorious/comment/179529147
Again BRAVO John! I pray many more see your brilliance and wake up! Go Max and always stay well!
If Its Not A Runaway, Its Not A Real Grand Jury
https://constitution.org/2-LawRev/roots/runaway.htm
The Federal Grand Jury is the 4th Branch of Government
https://restoregrandjuryrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/The-Federal-Grand-Jury-is-the-4th-Branch-of-Government.pdf
Have you reached out to any legal research organizations or law schools to get this research published? That is the best way to get it into the SCOTUS. Then other Pro Se'ers et al can reference that "official" research and use that as argument.
Justice denied is a
crime of its own.