Beaudoin v Baker et al (2022)

1:22-cv-11356-NMG Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint - STOP THE MANDATES & STOP THE SHOTS

I realize now that I neglected to post my amended complaint. As I work on my Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, due Friday, this amended complaint is important to get out there. I’m not an attorney and I’m alone in most of what I do, at least for now. Soon there will be a great number of reports generated and legal paths explored. Two joined me recently to generate content.

The People need to step up, else this free nation will go the way of all decrepit, evil regimes. Amass behind righteous anger in preservation of D’Aquino’s natural law and individual liberty, else be enslaved by the globalist regime that wants to cull you from the planet and end your lineage here and now. Please follow me to the TRUTH. Demand transparency. Fight for your rights. Take back Grand Juries into The People’s hands. The uni-Party red/blue D/R L/C globalists sold you out.

Follow Ed Dowd and his team Josh, Carlos, Yuri, and others. Between Ed’s statistical insurance data and the Massachusetts record-level source data, the story is complete and it’s a story of genocide perpetrated by oligarchs, governmental power brokers and stooges, and the morally impaired doctors and professionals who watched this happen.

---

The Defendants in my case are: CHARLES D. BAKER, individually and in his Official Capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MARGARET R. COOKE, individually and in her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Public Health of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MINDY HULL, individually and in her Official Capacity as Chief Medical Examiner of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, JANICE Y. GRIVETTI, MICHELE N. MATTHEWS, ROBERT M. WELTON, and JULIE HULL, individually and in their Official Capacities as Medical Examiners in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

I believe that since I sued the governor in his official capacity, the new governor steps into that role as a defendant. Maura Healey became governor in January of this year. Did you know she plays basketball?

Without more adieu, here is the INTRODUCTION to the complaint:

---

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff seeks equitable relief for an immediate and ongoing irreparable injury for which there is no remedy at law.

Plaintiff was unenrolled from law school because he refused to get the covid vaccine. The law school stated that they enacted the vaccine mandate based on covid data, much of which originates from Death Certificates fraudulently certified by Defendants or their agents. Other schools require covid vaccination based, in part, on the same fraudulent Death Certificates.

Plaintiff seeks, as remedies, a declaration of truth and injunctive relief that would afford Plaintiff an opportunity equal to the covid-vaccinated people to attend a law school. Plaintiff’s immutable characteristics are being used to discriminate against him. A declaration of truth, correction of falsities, and cessation of fraud will put law schools at risk of tort for recklessly endangering students. Vaccine mandates will end when the truth of vaccine lethality is declared.

Truth is found in EXHIBIT F, which details tens of vaccine deaths in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“the Commonwealth”). Defendants fraudulently certified vaccine deaths, drug overdose deaths, and blunt force trauma deaths as “covid” deaths on Death Certificates. Express evidence in EXHIBIT F is a smidgeon [sic] of vaccine deaths covered up in the Commonwealth. If the injunctive relief sought herein is granted, thousands of vaccine deaths in the Commonwealth alone will likely be uncovered in less than two weeks. Plaintiff seeks access to audit existing state public health databases. No one anywhere in the world has yet done this simple analysis.

Many living octogenarians believe they had a heart attack because they’re old, when the covid vaccine, known to cause tachycardia, myocarditis, arrhythmia, and other injuries, was the actual root cause. Thousands of decedents, certified as heart attack and stroke deaths, typical in the elderly, actually died from the covid vaccine, yet the truth is covered up.

In addition to vaccine cover-ups in individual records, Plaintiff also shows mathematically that ~2,700 EXCESS (more than expected) people died in the Commonwealth alone from cardiac arrest January 1, 2021 to August 15, 2022. Many of the excess 2,700 deaths were healthy people ages 65yo to 84yo and younger. The frail and susceptible over 85yo already died in 2020 and were not available to die again, else actual vaccine deaths would be greater.

As a corollary, Doctors in the Commonwealth still prescribe Remdesivir, though ~1,500 EXCESS people died January 1, 2021 to August 15, 2022 with acute renal failure (“ARF’). ARF is a pandemic in its own right, yet the Commonwealth’s Department of Public Health (“MA DPH”) seems uninterested. Doctors do what the FDA says. Remdesivir is on Emergency Use Authorization. Hospitals get large bonuses for its use. And this is second degree murder.

Most cases in equity related to covid in the past three years turn on individual liberty balanced against the public interest. Courts of equity are supposed to adjudicate in the interest of fairness and justice when situations arise beyond the law. The incongruous nature of a case from 1905 should not here be used as a substantive precedent in equity. While Plaintiff understands mandatory authority, equitable decisions of public interest and individual liberty are temporally dynamic in substance. Anyone in, or outside, the purview of law understands that new knowledge and facts change the balance. The vaccines were said to prevent transmission, though they never did. And upon that falsity, courts ruled in favor of the public interest over individual liberty. Those cases should not now be used as authority, persuasive or mandatory, in this court because transmission retardation (“TR”) was always a lie based on fraudulent trials. Given the known TR failure of these vaccines, the public interest benefit of vaccine mandates is nil, especially when balanced against the immense harm to individual liberties, a fortiori the actual physical harm to people.

Regarding physical harm, citizens of the Commonwealth deserve truth. Equitable relief herein requested will bring truth to light. Vaccination information will verify that children rapidly degenerated and died from causes consistent with deadly covid vaccines. Maim, though copious and real, is omitted herein because the many deaths are sufficient to make the argument.

We The People deserve to know the vaccine dates and types of these decedents:

• 7yo Cassidy of Groton
• 15yo Preston of Newton
• 17yo Eden of Essex
• 20yo Abby of Hollis, NH died at Mass General Hospital
• 30yo Brianna of Haverhill
• 42yo Holly of Athol
• 48yo Charles of Millbury
• 11yo Ian of Bellingham
• 6yo Laney of Duxbury
• > 1,000 over-50yo died from cardiac arrest, arrhythmia, PE, stroke just after vaccines

People are dying en masse in a death lottery. Plaintiff, this Honorable Court, and citizens of the Commonwealth and U.S.A. are entitled to know vaccination information of decedents in order to realize informed consent to such a deadly medical procedure as these injections.

Remedies to the injuries Plaintiff herein details comprise: 1) Declare the truth that fraud occurred. 2) Cease the fraudulent conduct. 3) Correct the fraud. 4) Provide data transparency.

Such redress serves the public interest by: 1) plaintiff and others will have access to law school education, 2) children, who may otherwise win the death lottery by submitting to mandates, will be informed and, thus, reject vaccination, 3) grandparent heart victims will learn truth and reject booster self-harm, 4) families on verge of divorce over child vaccination will learn truth and, thus, reconcile or agree to not enter their children into the vaccine death lottery.

Plaintiff, for his Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive relief against Charles D. Baker et al, known herein as “Defendants”, alleges as follows:

---

Tomorrow, I will post the next section or two of the complaint.

---

A special thank you to the organizers of the Covid Litigation Conference 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia March 25 and 26. VSRF’s Steve Kirsch and Mendenhall Law Group’s Warner Mendenhall put on a very good conference packed with information, exchanges of ideas, and stories of real people whose rights and liberties were violated and whose very lives were touched by personal loss of family, friends, coworkers, or one’s own health.

At this link here, you can find my picture in the bottom right. I did not speak of the data and cases that I found. The time was short and the interruptions threw me off. My apologies to all who asked me afterward why I didn’t mention what I discovered all through this pandemic.

Steve started the conference saying that we need to demand data transparency (vaccination dates and types) of the dead, then finished the conference telling the 200+ attorneys that no one has yet asked a judge to order a state to reveal the vaccination data of the dead. Where’s that emoji of the thinking face? LOL. Come on, Steve. If you read my substack, I’ll read yours.