BEAUDOIN v BAKER (A vaccine opera 4)
Factual Allegations Part 3
The entire complaint document and major exhibits can be found here at http://viaveravita.com/covid-19-fraud-and-vaccine-lawsuit.
Or you can continue this multi-article vaccine opera walking you through the complaint.
A vaccine opera 3 left off with paragraph 31 of Factual Allegations Part 2. Documented therein are more vaccine-caused deaths, some of which were labeled as U071 = “COVID-19.” Remember that only one record was labeled with Y590 or T881 (the vax code causes). Cassidy and Brianna were the victims of double fraud. Their death certificates fraudulently contained "U071 = “COVID-19” as a cause of death, though COVID-19 likely had no causal relation to their deaths. The second part of fraud was that of omission. The medical examiners knew the vaccine was a cause of death, but knowingly and purposely omitted any reference to the vaccine. This facilitated more young and old people to be killed by the vaccines.
Factual Allegations Part 3 will complete the Factual Allegations section of the Complaint. It contains deaths not causally related to COVID-19, but quite fraudulently labeled U071 = “COVID-19” nonetheless.
Factual Allegations Part 3 of 3
32. Detailed in EXHIBIT F are several fraudulent misrepresentations of causes of death. Specifically, some deaths involving vaccine as a cause, per the narrative, exclude Y590 = “Viral vaccines” and T881 = “Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified.” Other deaths allegedly do not involve COVID-19 as an actual or proximate cause of death but do list an ICD-10 code of U071 = “COVID-19.”
33. In 2021 and 2022, Defendant Medical Examiner Grivetti listed U071 = “COVID-19” as cause of death on numerous Death Certificates including those who died from “BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA OF TORSO” occurring only “HRS” before death. This was SFN_NUMBER 352 in 2021. Another example is SFN_NUMBER 19044 in 2021, a 68yo Male. Cause of death is listed as U071 = “COVID-19”. No other causes or contributing factors to death are listed. Not pneumonia, not heart attack, not low oxygen level, nothing – simply COVID-19. People do not die of COVID-19 alone. During 2020 – 2021, Grivetti certified many deaths as simply “COVID-19.” (see EXHIBIT F, Pages 9 and 106-110)
34. Egregiously, Defendant Grivetti also certified SFN_NUMBER 26429 in year 2020 with X42 = “ACUTE FENTANYL INTOXICATION” and U071 = “COVID-19.” “Acute” means reacting readily, in the near term, sharp and intense, severe symptoms in a short course, as opposed to chronic, which is longer term and ongoing. If this individual died from a fentanyl overdose in a short time, as in minutes, then the only cause of death would rightly be “ACUTE FENTANYL INTOXICATION” not U071 = “COVID-19.” It seems that Grivetti repeatedly and wrongly attributed COVID-19 as cause of death, when individuals were positive for COVID-19 at the time of death. (see EXHIBIT F, Pages 9 and 106-110) The CDC, in EXHIBITS B & C, explains when U071 = “COVID-19” should be listed as a cause of death.
Exhibit B can be found at this CDC link to pdf here entitled COVID-19 Alert No. 2 March 24, 2020 New ICD code introduced for COVID-19 deaths.
Here is specific text from that CDC Alert.
Should “COVID-19” be reported on the death certificate only with a confirmed test?
COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.
Notice that it does NOT give guidance to include U071 on people who tested positive for SARS-COV-2 unless it had some actual, proximate, or contributory cause of death.
Exhibit C can be found at this CDC link to pdf here entitled Report No. 3 - April 2020 Guidance for Certifying Deaths due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 [COVID-19].
Here is specific text from that CDC Alert.
Conclusion
An accurate count of the number of deaths due to COVID–19 infection, which depends in part on proper death certification, is critical to ongoing public health surveillance and response. When a death is due to COVID–19, it is likely the UCOD and thus, it should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I of the death certificate. Ideally, testing for COVID–19 should be conducted, but it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate without this confirmation if the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty.
“… proper death certification” is “critical to ongoing public health surveillance and response.” The language is clear in both Exhibits B and C from the CDC that there is a process by which U071 should be used. It seems the medical examiners in Massachusetts, as an enterprise, did not follow this CDC guidance, and that the public ended up with a wildly inaccurate count of C19 deaths, and that the “critical” “surveillance” necessity was ignored. Further, the C19 vaccines seem to have been protected from bad reputation by these same Massachusetts medical examiners.
(back to the Complaint’s Factual Allegations)
35. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and continuing through 2022, numerous fentanyl overdose deaths, blunt force trauma deaths, and other causes of death unrelated to COVID-19 fraudulently included U071 = “COVID-19” as a cause of death on the Death Certificate. (see EXHIBIT F, Pages 6, 8, 9, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 & many more)
36. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), signed into law March 27, 2020, provides a complex scheme of funding to states, hospitals, and other entities for COVID-19-related patients. Plaintiff knows and understands through 30+ years in business settings and through Plaintiff’s MBA degree that the pay plan defines the behavior. The US Government set up the pay plan to incentivize labeling deaths with U071 = “COVID-19.” As an independent journalist, Plaintiff discovered that agents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts solicited medical examiners to include U071 = “COVID-19” on Death Certificates. This “pattern” of conduct having “taken control” across the “enterprise” of public health government and non-government organizations is contrary to the public health mission and was lethal to many herein detailed.
37. The CDC is now known to have directed the social media undermining of VAERS, while the CDC also eschewed analysis of VAERS data though they had primary responsibility for such work. (see EXHIBIT H)
(At this point, there has been enough commentary. This article will end with Exhibit H in its entirety. It is obvious to anyone with a clear mind that the federal government of the USA and individuals therein are working as co-conspirators with social media and the pharmaceutical industry against the citizens of the United States. Much thanks to America First Legal and Senator Ron Johnson for their continued search for truth.)
Monsieur Coquin, when do you sleep??
Thank you for this exhaustive work researching and cataloguing. I sincerely hope it gets a hearing.
I think it's just freakin' AWESOME that you do what you do. HUGS!!!